I have seen some people who are for or against what he said but does anyone wonder what his point is? What is going on RIGHT NOW that compelled him to think think is OK? Military members are really encouraged NOT to speak up about their personal opinions (not to be openly political AS a military member, but as a private cit is OK).
I am really curious what you all think.
2007-03-13 07:34:50 · 11 answers · asked by persiandiva77 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Who do you think is in a better position to observe the reality of the effect (or lack thereof) of openly homosexual people on the military?
a) a Supreme Court Judge
b) a NY Times reporter
c) a Senator
d) any soldier
Assuming that the purpose of the military is "national defense" and not some other social equality jobs/education program, how do you think we can know the effect of a policy without the input of the people who are expected to make it work?
Yes, I do agree with him that "don't ask, don't tell" is the stupidest policy ever devised on any subject. It's a plea to have it both ways, we'll appease one side by keeping the rule, and appease the other by giving blanket permission to ignore a rule and to lie. Not surprising, given the source, though.
As far as the impact of homosexuality on the uniformed services, I have an opinion, and seven years active duty to found it upon. What does the side that opposes Gen Pace have? Degrees in social behavior or psychology?
Very conveniently, the Left criticizes conservatives who didn't serve, saying they have no right to support the war if they didn't serve, but they themselves were never in uniform, and criticize the opinions of those who are when it comes to matters that (might) significantly impact their ability to perform their duties.
This whole debate is definitionally harmful for one very clear overriding reason: The pro-gay-in-military crowd think that the rights of the individual in this case are paramount, and that is in direct opposition to the very nature of military service.
2007-03-13 07:49:55 · answer #1 · answered by open4one 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
This whole don't ask , don't tell policy is stupid. Why should anyone have to hide whatt they really are. So therefore I guess we should not speak of our religion, or political bias.. or maybe we shouldn't mention is we like corn flakes for breakfast... How dumb.
Hiding things is what gets us into trouble. We need to be open and honest. Look at what dishonestly is doing to this administration right now. They are hated and 70% of the country just wants them out of here. If Bush and buddies had tried a little honestly somewhere, anywhere along the way, they would not be in such trouble.
The only thing I give this guy who spoke out against gays if that at least he was honest... so gays should speak up too. Just because you are gay, does not mean you cannot love you country.. and fight and die for it. We are all the same when in the box.
2007-03-13 07:54:38 · answer #2 · answered by Debra H 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
each and each human beings are like truffles. we start up out with a similar user-friendly components, yet how they're blended, in what parts, what order, how long they're baked, and at what temperature, finally be certain how stable we come out. i've got frequently questioned what share extraordinary human beings - what share Einsteins, Edisons, Beethovens, Da Vincis - fall by employing the wayside using fact they omit out on a key element of their upbringing. how a lot of human beings ought to realize one thousand% better than what they do in the event that they only had the right encouragment and effective impacts becoming up. on the different hand, there is the thought the failings that don't destroy us make us stronger, and that devoid of stumbling blocks, human beings do no longer pointers on a thank you to conquer. it fairly is an extremely complicated blend of nature and nurturing that look to be certain the appropriate character, and how resilient or fragile it fairly is. As adults, we are much less truthfully prompted by employing adverse criticism, till that's echoing the criticism we won as infants. In those situations it fairly is supremely debilitating. it fairly is amazingly problematical to rewrite the script we've been given from our mum and dad, that's why I threw mine out and wrote my own.
2016-09-30 21:08:13 · answer #3 · answered by riopel 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
General Pace is the man, we need to find these queers and put them all out of the military all forms of sodomy are in direct violation of the UCMJ and the General just said what every real soldier feels
2007-03-13 08:55:46 · answer #4 · answered by Joel B 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
I commend a man high up in the military who is not afraid to clearly and plainly state his beliefs and not worry about being politically correct.
2007-03-13 07:44:42 · answer #5 · answered by Alan S 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Freedom of speech, baby. The Constitution protects your right to be racist or prejudiced! But I still think it's a beautiful thing.
2007-03-13 07:46:16 · answer #6 · answered by Effraye 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋
I think he's a decorated combat Marine who spoke his mind, which is what he gets paid to do, I might add
2007-03-13 07:38:32 · answer #7 · answered by kapute2 5 · 6⤊ 1⤋
No, not crazy very logical man. Sixty percent of America agrees with him. Get over it if your not with us then your against us!
2007-03-13 07:43:02 · answer #8 · answered by LuckyChucky 5 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Not at all. He is in a position where his opinion does matter, and he did clarify that it was HIS OPINION.
2007-03-13 07:45:01 · answer #9 · answered by kerfitz 6 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Nope.
You go girlfriend!
2007-03-13 07:37:42 · answer #10 · answered by Gottlos 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋