yes!!!! thats been my thought all along
2007-03-13 07:35:29
·
answer #1
·
answered by ** 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Let me get this straight, because we invaded a country that did nothing against us, disposed their leader for a government run by people without any political experience, disbanded their military and are trying to train a new one from scratch and now it's not coming together the way we want; we should slaughter them all?
Maybe it's time to step back and review the overall mission in Iraq.
2007-03-13 07:40:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by Alan S 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
"Kill them all?" No, but should we leaflet the country and give them X number of days to get out and then go through like we did Fullajah? Yes. But because civilians believe that is wrong it will never happen and the odds of wining this war is diminished.
2007-03-13 08:54:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
nothing else has worked...Give a warning to all civilians and whoever is left...they were fair warned, i think we should the whole place and let that country start over...Dont worry..there will be life left, ive heard roaches can withstand anything! =P
2007-03-13 08:16:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by marinesis 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Thats what Duke Nukem would say... and do :-)
I say carpet bomb the whole place, civilians are all in on it too.
2007-03-13 07:44:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No you cannot bomb to love or kill to save.
2007-03-13 07:32:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
NO, WE SHOULD LEAVE AND LET THEM KILL EACH OTHER................
2007-03-13 07:32:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by NATIVE NEW YORKER 4
·
0⤊
0⤋