Or do you want to keep the plain, ole, commonly known ancestor? Who is probably not nearly as pretty, I bet.
2007-03-13 06:36:28 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Some of you guys are really, really, really funny with that "inbred", "incest", stuff. So if we evolved there was no inbreds? All things have a starting point or don't they?
2007-03-13 07:11:56 · update #1
So, Incohere, you talk about what's true, so you must know something. What did this common ancestor look like. We know that Eve was a woman. What's your version?
2007-03-13 07:16:20 · update #2
Intrinsi, so how does the theory of evolution explain the races? ( it doesn't but I would like to know what you think )
2007-03-13 07:19:53 · update #3
But thats all a matter of opinion. Adam is where those chiseled perfect looking greek gods with those awesome physiques came from.
You know..those brad pitt types heh..sure are pretty too :)
2007-03-13 06:41:39 · answer #1 · answered by Triskelion 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If we are all descendants of Eve than we are all inbred. How does this explain the different races of people and their different physical features?
2007-03-13 06:43:39 · answer #2 · answered by *Cara* 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, rather than accept what's true, we should just accept which one looked better. That makes complete sense.
2007-03-13 06:41:26 · answer #3 · answered by Incoherent Fool 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
well if i want my family roots to have started with a large amount of incest then probly, but i dont belive in incest, but to answer your question:no.
2007-03-13 06:41:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Lucy is our ancestor
2007-03-13 06:41:53 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The truth is seldom pretty.
2007-03-13 06:41:23 · answer #6 · answered by Dr. Zaius 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋