English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Hello, I live in Southern Ontario. Recently my dog escaped my yard and was struck by a vehicle. Luckily my dog survived the accident without any severe damage. The car on the other hand needed $1,500 in repairs. I'm just curious as to who is liable for the damage? Would it be the drivers insurance company? My home insurance? I heard that if a vehicle strikes an animal, then there coverd through automible insurance under no fault. I'm trying to find more information on this matter. Any help would be appreciated.

2007-03-13 06:03:46 · 7 answers · asked by Barry D 1 in Cars & Transportation Insurance & Registration

7 answers

Sometimes insurance companys will pay for
damage. If the driver knows whose dog it is,
then he could make the owner pay. The same
is true for a farmer whose livestock gets out,
then he is liable for any damage that is done.
{i think}
Some states or countries have different laws
regarding this situation. ps. must have been
some dog.

2007-03-13 06:22:08 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Your dog, your liability. It's not a deer or a raccoon people, it's a dog. Domesticated animal. Same rules apply as if you were a dairy farmer and one of your cows escaped and caused a wreck. Why should the drivers insurance company cover your dog? I'd even bet there is a leash law that prevents dogs from running loose where you are.

Pay him the $1,500, then see if you stand a chance getting it back from homeowners insurance.

2007-03-13 06:35:39 · answer #2 · answered by oklatom 7 · 0 0

Taking allot of hits in this question First you ought to study your state regulations, yet a determine isn't straight away in charge for a Childs action, and each stat is diverse, yet factors are the youngster’s age, become the act intentional or no longer, become the determine negligent in supervising the youngster etc So on your case no its no longer automated the guy ought to hold you to blame, hence leaving them to sue your newborn get a judgment then wait till the youngster automobile earn an earnings to deliver at the same time, yet i'm optimistic as a determine you do no longer want this for the youngster As in the direction of the unlawful parking, doesn’t carry water using fact the automobile become park sooner or later with the broadcast indications approximately who would park, that's relatively helpful to purchase those vivid orange stickers to place on the guy abode windows advising them they are illegally parked

2016-11-25 00:38:41 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

You're responsible because your dog has to be leashed at all times in public. Doesn't matter if it escaped, it was your responsibility to make sure it couldn't.

The car owner can choose to go through his own insurance and make you pay only the deductible, if you're lucky. Or if he doesn't want to or doesn't have full coverage, then he can choose to go after you for the full amount.

But it is 100% your fault.

2007-03-13 06:14:10 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

interesting scenario - usually it's the other way around. I'd say that if your dog got away due to your negligence then you are liable - and that would probably go under your homeowners - just like if rover bit someone.

2007-03-13 06:08:43 · answer #5 · answered by Liberty Belle 5 · 1 0

the person who wrecked. should have both coverage...if not then its his own fault for not paying the extra bit. so if he doesnt have the insurance then it comes out of pocket.

i wrecked a couple of yrs ago avoiding a raccoon or something (i know, stupid) anyway, i didnt go after the animal to get the money

2007-03-13 06:07:34 · answer #6 · answered by jenivive 6 · 0 0

I think you'd be responsible for not having your dog securely in your yard.

2007-03-13 06:08:09 · answer #7 · answered by ? 6 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers