Anything that was capable on creating an entire universe, everything within it and then monitoring and communicating with the lifeforms within it, would have to be the most complicated thing in the universe...more complicated than the universe itself infact!
A pot is not more complicated an object than the potter that made it.
A part of a machine is not more complicated than the whole machine itself.
So whilst it's nice to imagine God is the easiest, cuddliest, friendliest, biggest, simplest ball of light you can, that can't be the so.
And yet, it's the very same arguement that religious folk use to discredit evolution. That something so complicated as humans don't come about by chance. Why doesn't the religious definition of what is complexity, apply to their head guy?
2007-03-13
04:47:06
·
5 answers
·
asked by
Adam L
5
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
Damn, lol. Re-reading the question, my brain is going faster than my hands! Sorry for any grammatical errors etc.
2007-03-13
04:48:56 ·
update #1
I've noted all the answers (so far) have been taking issue with God being considered simple however are ignoring the issue...
...if God is "simple by no means" or is not a single entity. Then you are agreeing that God is complex.
In which case, since (as you argue against evolution) something complex has to be created by something, not by fluke...then there was a creator of God?
2007-03-13
04:53:13 ·
update #2