2007-03-13 03:44:47 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Some people think so.
2007-03-13 03:47:00 · answer #1 · answered by LabGrrl 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Only if you are talking to a White American Christian. ^_^
Labels like that are only for the benefit of those who are part of those groups. I would prefer calling Non-Pagans "cowans", but in America they'd probably think I was calling them a cow and start a fight. *sigh*
2007-03-13 04:13:03 · answer #2 · answered by Kithy 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You need to add a few more nons to the description before you can really describe yourself
2007-03-13 03:50:04 · answer #3 · answered by Quantrill 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You tell us. If are not from the USA, not white and not christian, then yes, iguess you should describe yourself that way. Have a nice day!
2007-03-13 03:48:55 · answer #4 · answered by davelibby321 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It only says what you're not. It leaves open a lot of possibilities. But I see what you're saying, I think.
2007-03-13 03:50:48 · answer #5 · answered by GreenEyedLilo 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no that does not describe who you are at all
2007-03-13 04:04:59 · answer #6 · answered by corinne_29_ 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It might. I understand your point, but there are times when it's useful to say "this group" and "not this group".
2007-03-13 03:50:31 · answer #7 · answered by Pirate AM™ 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Better not, since it would only give a *very* vague description of you :).
2007-03-13 04:03:43 · answer #8 · answered by Trillian, Moon Daisy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only in a superficial sense.
2007-03-13 03:47:56 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I am a person
I am a human being
I am alive
I AM (see: no sex,religion,color)
2007-03-13 03:49:17 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋