Libby should wait until he's pardoned--which seems inevitable--then spill the beans. Rove and Cheney should be wearing orange jumpsuits.
2007-03-13 02:54:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by Hemingway 4
·
3⤊
3⤋
Asides from being morally the Right Thing To Do, I don't see any upside whatever for Libby to tell the truth.
He will probably write a book or sell the film rights. No realistic chance of the truth there either, but it might be fun reading.
Whats to tell anyway? We all know what happened, the details are pretty unimportant. Heres the bottom line - Bush got angry and spiteful and told Cheney to get even.
2007-03-13 10:00:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by jinoturistica 3
·
2⤊
1⤋
Hillary Clinton had the I dont recall syndrome when being questioned about her Whitewater scandal,she didnt get proscecuted..,yet Libby is?Valeries own husband was the one that outed her to Richard Armitage and in his own book,when will Wilson get proscecuted?I guess he didnt value his wifes life did he?
2007-03-13 09:58:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by jnwmom 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Libbys main detractor, Tim Russert, admits to having memory lapses....now what? Yes, this is my answer!
2007-03-13 09:55:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
nope hes going too do a little time but cheney's got deep pockets he'll be taken care off when he gets out and a last minute pardon bye bush at the end of his term
2007-03-13 10:00:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
He did tell the truth. He was convicted for lying about a totally irrelevant fraction of the pie. Hey, everyone needs a fall guy, right?
2007-03-13 09:53:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by MaHaa 4
·
0⤊
3⤋
Libby didn't do anything.
"Plame gate" is the biggest hoax in the history of American politics.
-Aztec276
2007-03-13 09:54:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋
He is not gonna say anything.
2007-03-13 09:53:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋