a women with just a plain gold or silver band for a wedding ring? Do you see anything wrong with this?
2007-03-13 02:27:01 · 27 answers · asked by DGBrandy 2 in Family & Relationships ➔ Weddings
I mean instead of a diamond.
2007-03-13 02:30:05 · update #1
Sometimes I think the ones with diamonds are too gaudy.
Plus I also think that the gaudy ones are usually the cause of a huge debt for newly weds, were simpler ones are affordable without charging them, and if the lady really wants a diamond, or a bigger one, just wear the one she has for a few years and save up for a bigger one. Or wait until they're a more financially stable couple later in the marriage, and buy a bigger one!
:)
2007-03-13 02:36:38 · answer #1 · answered by Be Still and know He's God 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
That's what I'm getting. Not because we can't get or afford anything else because we could easily get something else. It's what I want well, actually I'd rather not have to wear a ring at all, but he wants us to get rings, so I'll do it for him.
What do I assume? Well, actually I don't usually look at women's jewelery or even notice. My lover, who was never married wore a wedding band on his left ring finger when we first met and started dating (it had other sentimental value to him) I never noticed until almost six months to a year after we had met! (and we were living together by then!) I don't think anyone will really notice and those that do, well let them think what they think. If they're rude enough to say something well, just be a jerk right back! It's fun to be a jerk at least. If your happy, who cares?
2007-03-13 09:37:13 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't see anything wrong with it, but some judgamentanl and rude folks my think that you couldn't afford a real wedding ring, or that your simple band is an indication of poverty, they will ask you where the engagement ring is, and if you are going to upgrade to a bridal set later.
There are wedding bands incrusted with diamonds. You can consider this alternative.
2007-03-13 09:31:17 · answer #3 · answered by Blunt 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Actually that is exactly what I want for my wedding band! My parent'sis the same so I guess that is where I get it from. No need for a diamond, too expensive.
2007-03-13 12:55:07 · answer #4 · answered by laceywat1 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
nothing wrong with it. lots of women just wear a band. at my job a diamond gets in the way but a band is perfect. there are some really pretty bands out there now.
2007-03-13 09:30:39 · answer #5 · answered by misse 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
That shes married.
I prefer the plain gold bands, I think they are more traditional looking and I like the look better than fancier bands.
When I want to be fancy I wear my engagement ring.
2007-03-13 10:21:31 · answer #6 · answered by kateqd30 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Personally, I think they're nicer...I prefer unique bands without diamonds. My fiance and I are having matching wedding bands that are engraved that say 'Of my love be sure'...posey rings come in many different styles and are very unique.
Do a google search for 'posey rings' and see what you find...
2007-03-13 09:38:22 · answer #7 · answered by emay02 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There's nothing wrong with it. Its not the size of the diamond that matters!! Its all about what that band means to the person wearing it...and their significant other.
2007-03-13 17:37:00 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
She likes simple. I don't see anything wrong with this. My mom had a plain gold band and that was the only jewelry she ever wore.
2007-03-13 09:33:35 · answer #9 · answered by pixie 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Nothin wrong with it. Some women don't like diamonds or other stones, so a band suits them just fine.
2007-03-13 10:41:23 · answer #10 · answered by SupaDupa 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋