Most of the historic buildings, corporate offices in London are illuminated in the night, wasting a huge amount of energy. Nobody is talking about them. Is the CO2 debate being used for putting up more taxes on people rahter then really saving the energy.
2007-03-13 01:55:56 · 2 answers · asked by www.nrifm.com 2 in Environment
Why don't they put the clocks 2 hours ahead in spring so it will not go dark until 11:00pm in summer and 9:00 pm in winter. That way we could use natural light instead of these iridescent light bulbs that Arthur Daily would have been proud of, better still, even Rodney Trotter couldn't have done a better deal!!!.
2007-03-13 02:08:28 · answer #1 · answered by Old Man of Coniston!. 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The only greenhouse gases emitted by parliament emanate from the mouths of politicians.
Yes the CO2 con is a means of raising taxes. No one is allowed to question the god of global warming, we must accept what they say, for it is the new religion.
2007-03-13 12:09:12 · answer #2 · answered by Do not trust low score answerers 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋