they are very similar in a way
In the case of homosexuality, one party does the other party in the posterior (with both parties' consent)
In Iraq, Bush is doing his whole country up the posterior (with or without their consent.
2007-03-12 22:18:40
·
answer #1
·
answered by ladybugewa 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
I don't have a problem with either and there is nothing immoral about the war in Iraq...if the war in Iraq is immoral then every war we've had is immoral...US troops are going to die because thats what happens in a war and it IS true that if we pulled out of Iraq right now it WOULD create an enormous safe place for terrorists to hide and then we can say goodbye to our saftey here in the states...so stop bashing Bush for declaring war on an evil regime and stop saying our military can't do it's job
2007-03-13 08:28:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Ahh, the woefully misinformed. Perhaps you could point out which parts of the Joint Resolution of Congress authorizing the use of force was "immoral"? Perhaps you'd rather have a terrorist-funding (Haman, PLFP, Abu Nidal, Carlos the Jackal, the list goes on and on) brutal dictator back in power?
Perhaps you'd rather live under Shar'ia?? A US general puts homosexuality in the same basket as adulterty. Ohh, how horrible!! In the meantime, 7 countried carry DEATH PENALTIES for homosexuality. The number was 8 before the US invasion of Afghanistan. Same-sex intercourse officially carries the death penalty in several Muslim nations: Saudi Arabia (public execution by beheading, anyone?), Pakistan, Iran, Mauritania, Sudan, Somalia and Yemen. In many Muslim nations, such as Bahrain, Qatar, Algeria and the Maldives, homosexuality is punished with jail time, fines, or corporal punishment.
Hmm, we have a moral condemnation on one hand, the death penalty, "corporal punishment", and jail time on the other.
Which society would you rather live in?
The left and secular progressive continue to entertain us all, fiddling away while Rome burns.
2007-03-13 09:36:04
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The war is immoral we are over there for all the wrong reasons its sad when you see countrys pulling away and not helping the US anymore I support our troops and hope they all return home safely but I do not support Bush and tryin to take over another country when we have our own problems right here at home What has a homosexual person ever done to anyone they say this is the land of the free and the home of the brave Brave yes free No i mean if you have the right to be with the person who makes you happy and makes you smile and makes you feel like noone else what right do we as americans have the right to take that away from a homosexual person I believe bush should end the war bring our troops home and work on repairing our country instead of tryin to fix everything but bush is a sorry excuse for a president i think
2007-03-13 05:30:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by Samantha 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Pace says homosexuality is immoral only because he's a backwards jerk. We've gone too far with basic human rights for anyone to be able, at least through the USA government, to declare outright a war on homosexuality.
However, following that reasoning, you make a great point. Absurdity draws a fine line, doesn't it? This administration has certainly had its share of absurdity.
2007-03-13 05:39:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by ... 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Iraq War
2007-03-13 07:44:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by stacey f 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Definitely have to go with the Iraq War
2007-03-13 05:24:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by goldleader15 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
morality comes from belief and religion, the Bible, the Torah and the Koran all speak against Homosexuality and not against war. If gay people want to serve I say Great. war is not about morals it is about winning.
2007-03-13 05:45:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by THOR! 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Geneal misses the bigger picture. Gay or straight, USA soldiers are getting killed one at a time...like emptying the Hoover Dam with a wheelbarrow.
2007-03-13 05:19:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
the Iraq war for the plain reason that you were not born with it
2007-03-13 05:17:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by al 3
·
0⤊
1⤋