Aren't evolution and gravity both theories in crisis?

Question

If the theories of evolution and gravity are false, that proves creationism--God is responsible for the arrangement of celestial bodies and the diversity of life. Now, consider the facts:

1. Darwin and Newton both based their ideas on their hatred of Christianity, rather than on scientific fact. Darwin was an atheist, and Newton was an occultist. Both viciously criticized Christianity in their writings!

2. Since Darwin and Newton's days, their theories have both been proven wrong. Mendel proved Darwin wrong with genetics, and Einstein proved Newton wrong with relativity. Yet dogmatic Darwinists and Newtonists still tout their theories as inerrant fact!

3. Recent advancements in information theory have thrown Neo-Darwinism into doubt, now that people realize that only God can make new information. Recent advancements in quantum physics have thrown Neo-Newtonism into doubt, now that people realize that gravity can't be reconciled with the other fundamental forces on a quantum level.

4. Evolutionism and gravitationism have both been plagued by hoaxes and LIES like Haeckel's embryos and the luminiferous aether, which those dogmatic atheist scientists have swallowed for decades, hook, line, and sinker!

5. There is growing scientific consensus against both evolution and gravity, and they will soon no doubt be overthrown, to be replaced by the scientific theories of Intelligent Design and Intelligent Falling!

Newton's anti-Christian views were whitewashed after his death by the gravitationist conspiracy. Here are quotes of him criticizing the most fundamental Christian doctrine, the Trinity!

"In all the vehement universal and lasting controversy about the Trinity in Jerome's time and both before and long enough after it, this text of the "three in heaven" was never once thought of. It is now in everybody’s mouth and accounted the main text for the business and would assuredly have been so too with them, had it been in their books. Let them make good sense of it who are able. For my part, I can make none. If it be said that we are not to determine what is Scripture what not by our private judgments, I confess it in places not controverted, but in disputed places I love to take up with what I can best understand. It is the temper of the hot and superstitious art of mankind in matters of religion ever to be fond of mysteries, and for that reason to like best what they understand least."

I don't need to criticize Big Bang theory, because it's a part of the theory of gravity for the same reason that Abiogenesis is a part of the theory of evolution! But yes, your criticisms of it are correct.

As for dark matter, dark matter is obviously Angels.

Answer 1

Intelligent falling! WOW what a concept!!! ROTFLMAO!!!

Answer 2

Some Hindu scientists opposed Darvin's theory since it
was against what is written in ancient Hindu scriptures.
Their oppositions went un-noticed because India was
under British rule at that time.

However, Newton's theory is still valid for all objects of
macrocosm. It is the mistake of the scientists who tried
to apply the laws of macrocosm to microcosm.
The Upanishads say that rules of microcosm differ from
those of macrocosm.

For example, modern science treats velocity of light
as Universal Constant. Einstein's theory says that light
ray bends as it passes by objects of heavy gravity,
and it was proved. The point is, how can that which
'bends' be taken as a universal constant?

Ancient Indians were the first to calculate the velocity
of light. Rig Veda Bhashyam by Sayana Madhava
gives the following Sloka praising the Sun:

Yojanam sahasre dve, satadve, dvecha yojane
Ekena nimeshardhena kramamaana namosthuthe

A similar poem appears in the work of Nannaya of Telugu.
One Yojana equals 15788.8 meters, and half of Nimesha
equals 8/75 fraction of a second. This gives the velocity
of light as 325940 km/s. We have to remember here that the
above value is an approximate one intended for easy
remembrance, like remembering the value of pi as 22/7. It
is better than the value 215000 km/s given by Danish
astronomer Ole Roemer in 1676.

The word "kramamaana" of the above Sloka has the
meaning of gradual minute change. The interpretation
is to say that velocity of light is dependent on the
potential energy of the star. The velocity of light
from newly formed stars will be slightly faster than
that from our Sun. Only after modern science develops
more sophisticated equipmet, they will discover this.

And one day, the scientists will discover that there is
nothing like a 'universal constant' in the visible universe.
Every created thing is subject to change with time.
The one univelsal constant beyond time is the Almighty.

The universe is governed by general laws which can
be descerned by many scientists. However, for every
general law, there will some special amendment, and
so on. The more the science develops, the more they
will know that there is a universe of knowledge present
even in a small object like a sand of grain.

For those sceptics who suspected that soul is made
of some substance, ancient Hindu philosophers replied
that the soul is Consciousness. Advaita theory says
that each soul is a piece of Infinite Soul (Almighty)
who is Infinite Consciousness.

Unless a provision is made to discover some thing in
every thing, explorers lose scientific interest. All such
discoveries will finally lead to the discovery of the
infinite knowled provided by Infinite Consciouness.
A few will realize it in the present birth, others will
realize it in their births to come.

Even though a father is interested to teach philosophy
to his teenage children, they will not be mature enough
to understand it. The right time has to come
for every thing.

Answer 3

Oh yes, we all know how annoying it is when things float off the ground, without gravity holding it down! You'd think that pretty much proved the 'theory' of gravity.
As for evolution, there is lots of evidence in support for it. Consider the fact that the embryo of countless different animals, from dolphins to humans to chickens, all look similar. Also consider the fossils of ancient horses. You can actually trace it from back when the horse was no larger than a small dog, up to present day. This is just a small sample of the huge amount of evidence for evolution. I don't even want to get technical, as it would take up too much room.

And also, keep in mind that if one theory is proven wrong, it does not make another theory right. In other words, IF these theories were proven wrong (and note I say IF), it does not prove your theory right.

Answer 4

education device failing us? sure, that's. human beings additionally do no longer understand that gravity and evolution are the two actuality and theory. The stated strikes of gravity are a regulation, they have by no skill wavered and are subsequently actuality. interior the least puzzling words, evolution is the replace in frequency of alleles in a inhabitants over the years; given a inhabitants to computer screen this happens in each inhabitants. there are of direction mechanisms to describe the two gravity and evolution, that are theories (and the long-term results of evolution, that's additionally viewed a theory) And asserting some thing is "in basic terms a theory" is worse than asserting some thing is "in basic terms a actuality," a theory isn't an theory, a theory is supported by way of many observations and information; yet you're perfect, some theories are greater effective supported than others.

Answer 5

um- i'm really confused, so your saying that there isn't gravity, huh, what an interesting concept concidering that we humans have such a hard time with a non existant force, (i'e. launching rockets into outer space, flight, jumping, you know, the basics of going up). I guess if i belive in this hard enough, i could jump to mars, don't know what i would do when i got there, probably slap the alien that thought it would be funny to lead the ancient jews though the desert, and let them think they were god. becouse of thoughs retards, i now have to read stuff that makes no sense. if it hadn't been for thoughs aliens, moses would have died in the desert, and i know it sounds cruel, but the world would have been better off. as it is now, we have to deal with not only chitistians that say that gravity is non-existant, (still trying to figure that one out), but that in no way could the supreme creater, what every that being/force it, couldn't have made the world with evolution, but we also have to deal with Muslims constantly calling for a jihad cuz someone looked at them wrong, and i don't think that i have to say why that is messed up, (09/11/2001). the only people I can't say anything bad about are the Jews, there good people. Yea if moses would have died in the desert, they would exist, but that is another paradox.

lets review, gravity is a force that pulls things toward each other, i.e. the moon and the earth. einstine didn't prove newton wrong, relitivity just means that everything sits on a blanket, probably why the earth stays in orbit so nice around the sun. and by the way, who is anyone to say that the supreme creater did or didn't set up things the way that newton, and einstine said they did.
evolution is FACT, i know that is hard for some to understand, but think of this, animals adapt to survive in the wild, the ones that adapt the best are going to be the ones that breed, that is the thory of evolution in a nut shell.

lastly, if you see a martian, slap him/her really hard for makeing things so messed up on earth, unless of course you like to go to kentuky to roast ants, then you'd probably identify with them.

Answer 6

Okay, this is getting really silly.

But you are correct about both theories. Neither Newtonian Physics nor Relativity are true. That's the fact. 100% Both are incomplete. But both help us explain the movements of bodies at the sizes they deal with, so they are very useful even in their incompleteness. Newtonian physics in all its incompleteness is necessary for the technological sciences.

Evolution also has gaps in it that science hopes to explain later. Avoid weird dogmatists. You'll see that most of the people who like to brag about how infallible evolution is don't understand the theory, or have weird things they believe it says but it doesn't. (Anyone who tells you about Brown English moths can be ignored off hand.)

For all the "trash talk," we have major things to work out in evolution. Some are the presence of apparent, "evolutionary inevitabilities." For example the eye has, according to the fossil record, evolved three times, yet the end product is nearly identical. That's bizarre and needs explained. Also fins in aquatic species. They evolved multiple times, at least three. There are other biological systems that could have been used for aquatic locomotion, but fins developed in all three cases. It was not necessarily the easiest way to get the desired result in all the cases.

Lastly the slow step by step process we always hear about doesn't really explain things as well as we would like it to. It seems to move along more like static static jump, static static jump. That needs explained.

So you can feel happy that science doesn't know everything. Only fools would think it does.

Answer 7

that's the best argument i've heard for their side yet, and you aren't even religious! (or ARE you?)

why not start attacking the big bang too? inflationary theories seem rather ad hoc, don't they? what about the homogeneity thing? what is the dark matter?

the irony of attacking scientific theories is that in doing so, you become a scientist yourself. at least if you do so coherently.

Answer 8

Since Mendel (a monk) and Einstein did not refute, but rather improved our understandings of evolution and gravity respectively, your conspiracy theory falls to shreds. I don't know of a "Darwinist" who rejects Mendelian genetics or "Newtonist" who rejects relativity. Since mutations that add information to the genome have arisen, I would say you're left with evolution for now. As for gravity, feel free to float away.

Answer 9

Im sure both Darwin and Newton would bow down before your superior intelligence.
Not.

Answer 10

Look how hard you have to fight for your faith I enjoy watching it Very entertaining Wish you the best of luck
Seriously if your god & creation were perfect why would you have to question?
Why would anyone bother spending so much time
Your church has lied & hoaxed its way to the top

Answer 11

Newton recanted and admitted that he made up the theory of gravity all by himself.
(Of course he was also madder than a hatter)