Nude photographs
On November 11, 2003, Larry Flynt announced to the Associated Press he purchased photographs of a "fully nude" Lynch who was "frolicking with the soldiers" in an Army barracks. Flynt told the press that the soldiers who sold him the photos "wanted to let it be known that she's not all apple pie."
She was a wild lady they said.
2007-03-12 19:35:29 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Because she had the right to do so. But we aren't given the right to SEE what has happened to the soldiers who have returned from this misguided war.
2007-03-12 20:31:27 · answer #1 · answered by front door 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Jessica Lynch Nude
2017-01-11 03:28:53 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
she didnt pose nude for the photos, they were taken while partying on the night before they all left before going to iraq, the soldiers who sold them wanted to make some money and did, and they sold their souls to get it, those were private photographs and flynt was at least honorable by never allowing them to be published.
2007-03-12 20:30:27 · answer #3 · answered by sofmatty 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Because it's a free country, so what if she did? It's pathetic that you hate our soldiers so much that you have to dig up dirt like this. I don't care if you were in Vietnam (or at least you claimed to be) you're still a pitiful human being. You cashed government paychecks for what, 30 years or so, what does that say about you?
2007-03-12 20:05:36 · answer #4 · answered by Marc B. 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
They're probably blurry and unidentifiable. Character assassinations often end up something like this.
(Isn't it funny that when liberal women do this the liberal whiners say nothing or will actually defend it?)
2007-03-12 19:53:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because war can get boring at times. If the other soldiers were selling them, she didn't get any money out of it.
2007-03-12 19:45:25 · answer #6 · answered by DOOM 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
She's a human being. And like the rest of us- she did something without "thinking" & it caught up with her. Compared with what happend to her later, does it REALLY matter what she did THEN???
2007-03-12 19:48:41 · answer #7 · answered by Joseph, II 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Well now we know where you get all the BS news you post in Answers,
from Hustler
Why are we not surprised !!!!!!
lmao
2007-03-12 23:41:34 · answer #8 · answered by jeeper_peeper321 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
She was young and not thinking about the future.
2007-03-12 20:20:58 · answer #9 · answered by adrianne 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She did it for the money and also because she obviously has no self-respect. She's more to be pitied.
2007-03-12 19:45:18 · answer #10 · answered by miri-miri-off-the-wall 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋