English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-03-12 18:19:06 · 28 answers · asked by Hafizul Azrin H 1 in Politics & Government Military

My figure is actually derived from a main media. but it included people who died because of sanctions by UN ( USA willing) to that country.

2007-03-12 19:38:38 · update #1

28 answers

George believes that by securing the Iraq oil fields for Halliburton he is saving a fortune with body bags. You do know that oil is the primary ingredient in the manufacture of body bags don't ya?

2007-03-12 18:29:02 · answer #1 · answered by leonard bruce 6 · 2 4

If we had found out no longer something interior the previous 4 and a a million/2 years of being in Iraq i could trust you from the beginning up. If this replaced into early 2003 and Turkey replaced into hoping to invade Iraq with us and Bush asked for them to hold off, that could have been hypocritical. Now, with greater effective information this is a found out place, an know-how that extra gamers in this mess will make it exponentially worse and impossible to fulfill all of us's objectives, which includes the Turk's. in spite of this, i'm no longer confident that such is the reasoning at the back of the request. i think of this is in trouble-free terms that their involvement will make our place that incredibly greater painful. as a consequence, i ought to agree that the stance is hypocritical.

2016-12-14 17:43:27 · answer #2 · answered by amass 4 · 0 0

IF YOU THINK ITS BAD NOW , YOU AINT SEEN NUTHIN YET. We are witnessing the beginning of the end of Industrial Civilization as we now know it. The world is quickly running out of OIL. USA is grabbing all it can get. India , Russia and China and India are now forming an alliance to help them get theirs. USA cant let them have it or they will starve. India and China are desperate for oil. Iraq is gonna turn into a massive resource war and this is a matter of life or death for USA. If the media were to tell the people in USA the truth about this , it would cause a massive panic. Therefore it is called "The Greatest Story Never Told". We got maybe 10 years left , no more . Have fun. By the way, we are Americans. We can do anything to anyone and nobody can stop us. HA HA HA HA HA !!!!!!!

2007-03-12 21:51:55 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

He should be able to sleep great, he has done and is doing the right thing. Iraq is but one battle in the War on Terror. If we don’t have the fortitude and determination to see it through, the cost to America is going to be higher than anybody can imagine. No one wants to see American soldiers wounded or dying, but the fact is our military losses in this war have been incredibly low compared to any other conflict we have ever engaged in. If we don’t have the stomach to see this through, there are going to be some very hard days ahead for America. The solution is not quitting, the solution is not pulling out, the solution is not tying the President’s hands. If congress isn’t happy with how the war is being managed, they need to come up with some concrete, viable alternatives to what the administration is doing. Quitting IS NOT THE ANSWER, nor is it even an alternative. Leaving Iraq without settling the question of who is in control of the country is only going to cost more American lives in future battles, and show us to be extraordinarily weak. I am sure the eventual outcome could be attacks on our soil that will make 9/11/2001 look like child’s play.

2007-03-12 18:39:59 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Im iraqi medical student , my uncle wife works in the ministry of health as sector manager ..and from her sources i can tell u for sure tha the total iraqi people killed since war started till february 19th 2007 is 63296 not 600000

2007-03-12 21:24:52 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

can you provide a legitimate source of information with that number or did you get that of biased sites like moveon?

because here are some facts to consider 600,000 bodies have to go some where and there is no evidence that many burials have occurred. there is no way for the department that handles death registries could possibly track,catalog and count that many deaths in that amount of time. Because it comes to just over 418 dead a day for 4 years and the lower branches of the Iraqi government are still trying to catch up with pre war issues.

So please present where you got this information, because my bet is, it is a biased source and untrustworthy from the get go.

2007-03-12 18:28:18 · answer #6 · answered by Stone K 6 · 1 4

The alternate question is over 3,100 Americans killed and climbing. Can he sleep? Of course, none of those young Americans were in his inner circle. None of his inner circle will ever face danger in Iraq, Afghanistan, or when he starts it, Iran. You can sleep really well when you are a chickenhawk.

2007-03-12 18:29:22 · answer #7 · answered by tranquility_base3@yahoo.com 5 · 2 2

hmm..most probably not..think about it..you've just started a meaningless war where there is no WMD..no Iraqi ever did any harm to US citizens and create a helluva mess down there..especially violence..

2007-03-12 19:32:03 · answer #8 · answered by nizE 3 · 0 1

Can you provide your source?

I have heard that closer to 50,000 Iraqis have died since the war began. Your source, please?

And, yes, mostly at the hands of other Muslims, terrorists, and country men.

2007-03-12 18:24:07 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4 5

George Bush is not affected by the Iraqi deaths because he deems the war as valid against terrorism.

2007-03-12 18:21:46 · answer #10 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 1 6

fedest.com, questions and answers