Infinity makes God impossible.?

Question

There's somewhere God has not been.

Before God started to exist, there was another God that existed and who "hides" himself from the Christian/Islamic/Jewish God.

IF Christians say that God has always been because that's what the Bible says, then how can that even be known? God himself could not know such a thing. Nomatter how great a being is, there is always somewhere they haven't been and a time when they did not exist.

God, nomatter what he is, is limited by space and time...

If one tries to explain God as being simply a "higher dimensional" then there is always a higher dimension option.

The point is, that if God cannot be all knowing, or as the bIble puts it, "Omnipresent," "Omniscient" or "Omnipotent" he is an imposter or he simply does not exist.

Find another way.

Sunestau...

It is clearly you who are lacking in some of the fundamental understanding of physics, demonstrating the typical pseudo-scientific and sophomoric comments of many Christians.

Transdimensional theory answers your dilemmas. God is not needed - That's highly fallible, creation ""science.""

What is outside our realm of understanding? Then let's figure out why! That's reason.

Christianity says, it's all too much to know.... Let's not explore.

Answer 1

Not true. Read the Bible :-)

Answer 2

In Hinduism, Parama Atma means Infinite Soul.
He has no begining or no ending in the dimentions
of space or time.

What is a soul? Soul is not any material. If it is material,
it would have perished after a time. The Upanishads
say that soul is consciousness. Almighty is Infinite
Consciousness. How can the finite understand the
way in which infinite knows it all?

His knowing is not limited by methods familiar
to humans. He is not a higher dimention -
He is the highest of all that exists. He is the creator of
all that exists.

All your questions are based on logic. The very method
of logic has its own limitation:

In the 1930s, Austrian mathematician Godel proved a
theorem which became the "Godel theorem" in cognition
theory. It states that any formalized 'logical' system
in principle cannot be complete in itself. It means
that a statement can always be found that can be
neither disproved nor proved using the means of that
particular system. To discuss about such a statement,
one must go beyond that very logic system; otherwise
nothing but a vicious circle will result. Psychologist
say that any experience is contingent - it's opposite
is logically possible and hence should not be treated
as contradictory.

During 1800s, Anthropologists had a problem as to how
to classify human beings. One researcher proposed the
expression "intelligent animal". After advanced studies
on monkeys, it was dropped. Another researcher proposed
"tool using animal". After observing some animals
making wooden tools and sharpening them with knife like
stones, it was dropped. Another researcher proposed
"weapon using animal". A decade ago, a rare film was
shot in African forests. One short monkey was hit very
badly by a big monkey. The short monkey prepared a
wooden knife using stones and hid it on the top of a
tree. After some days, when the big monkey came to
attack the short monkey, it ran up to the tree for the
weapon it has hid and killed the big monkey. The one
thing that the anthropologists found with any group of
human beings, even if they did not have contacts with
the out side world for thousands of years, is
spirituality with some form of religion. So, man is a
"spiritual animal" if you want to call him that way.

The Upanishads say that "Manush" (human) was so named
because he has "Manas" a mind higher than that of the
animals which realises the divinity in creation. It was
present since the creation of human beings. Religion is
the characteristic feature of most of the human beings.
It is as eternal and and as unchanging as the Almighty.
Disbelief by a few will not affect it.

The percentage of atheists in the world are less than
5%. Can the 5% question the faith of 95%?
Then thay will be questioning the very human nature!

Answer 3

The Bible never calls God "omnipotent," "omniscient," or "omnipresent." You will have a hard time substantiating those attributes from Scripture. And God is, according to Anselm's definition, "that than which nothing is greater." Without realizing it, your question actually validates Anselm's ontological argument for the existence of God.

Answer 4

Perhaps you should think like this.

God allowed time to exist in this world/our dimension. Time is evil... time is Lucifer. Humans, and all that is evil, and full of sin are the only spirits/beings which experience time. God created time ... He is beyond time. We cannot comprehend that until we are in His presence. Then we will know such a gift it is to be without time amidst all of His love.

Thankfully Lucifer is who he is and he will be destroyed. Therefore time will cease to exist... and beyond the end God's Kingdom exists forever without time.

Read it again and you will understand.

Answer 5

The only problem with your thesis is that time is not infinite. Time does not exist outside of matter. Something could have "always" existed in the unverse, but still be finite in years. If God created the universe, then he or she is outside the limits of time as measured in the universe. He or she would not be restricted by such measurements.

Answer 6

Time itself is part of his creation. "Before" creation is undefined since before was part of what was created.

Space itself was part of that creation. The idea of distance would be meaningless without God's actions.

The relativistic meaning of "ELSEWHERE" is undefined with God, since he already is there, he needs 0 time to travel there... wherever "there" is. This means the light cone is expanded to include all of space.

It has been suggested that mass and time parity REQUIRE the existence of something "like God."

Go find a primer on modern physics if you don't understand these terms or concepts.

Answer 7

Well of course God's existence is physically impossible, he's supernatural. All you've shown is that God cannot exist within the laws of nature, but really no one was claiming that he could. God doesn't exist, but not for the reasons you've given.

Answer 8

I think what we humans do is try to contain infinity in the limited ideas we call "God."

Answer 9

*laughing*...why, because it doesn't make sense to YOU? No, I don't think so. God has always been and will always be. That you don't understand that will not negate that it is true.

Answer 10

how can somthing be explained that is beyond current knowledge therefore beyond comprehension ... nice try though ..