I thought you needed more evidence? it says i was stealing car stereos, that my wifes mini van was seen around 3AM when a victim woke up, according to the police report the victim recognized the van and wrote down the license plate and my house was raided and searched for car audio equipment.
Items Seized.
Utah Drivers License
RCA mp3 player
CD player
Mitchell Highschool ID.
what the ****? im filing a complaint against the police department, i was taken down to the police station and questioned and treated like a ******* criminal.
2007-03-12 14:52:43 · 3 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law Enforcement & Police
If they had a warrant, they had the right to do that. If you want to challenge that warrant you should contact a lawyer and see if you have a case.
2007-03-13 05:38:57 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Clearly there must have been enough evidence if the police already had a warrant. A judge isn't just going to sign one without the police having there ducks in a row.
There is also something called exigent circumstances. In short that would mean the police wouldn't need a warrant if they felt that the evidence could be lost while waiting to obtain a warrant.
However, as I said earlier, if they had a warrant then there was sufficient proof. You can file a claim but don't expect too much, your S.O.L.
2007-03-13 08:23:41 · answer #2 · answered by evil_paul 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In order to get a Judge to sign a warrent the Police must have some compelling evidence. Do you think the description of the van and the license plate was enough. I do, and apparently the Judge did as well.
2007-03-13 06:28:58 · answer #3 · answered by Tom M 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋