Where did the matter that made the particle that exploded and resulted into the Big Bang come from?
And scientists now are saying that the universe must of had an origin, most don't believe it always existed:
2007-03-12
14:09:17
·
29 answers
·
asked by
Chris
3
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
I know these are not related directly but what you are saying is that you don't know how everything got here? Then how do you presume that the Big Bang made everything which caused evolution?
You can't know where you're going until you know where you've been:
2007-03-12
14:14:08 ·
update #1
I'm serious if you know how then please tell me....
If you have some good evidence for your side then you could get best answer
2007-03-12
14:16:17 ·
update #2
All i am saying is that evolution should not be taught as fact unless we know for a fact that it even could have been started
2007-03-12
14:19:12 ·
update #3
Georgus.... It's me the fifteen yr old you asked the question about. And yes i will look at all of them.........
2007-03-12
14:35:23 ·
update #4
This is a question that we will not know the answer to for a very long time if ever. Our ability to examine the past cannot see past the big bang. To speculate what existed before that is just that, speculation, without evidence.
Sometimes the only logical answer is we don't know.
2007-03-12 14:18:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by Murazor 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Wow, I never knew there was a discrepancy in the whole creation/evolution feud about the universe having an origin ... I thought the argument was whether it was a created or "natural" occurrence and when it occurred.
I hope that you aren't asking this as a way of putting down the evolution and big bang theory .. as a way of trying to prove God. That's a bit of an unfair thing to do, since everyone, including scientists, will admit that they do not have all the answers. Neither do creationists.
The fact is, and it's the only fact that matters in my book, none of us truly know, we weren't there. None of us was an eyewitness and can say with certainty that this is how it was done. The Bible is not that much forthcoming about the technical details of creation, and scientific explanations have holes in them which have yet to be figured.
2007-03-12 21:19:58
·
answer #2
·
answered by arewethereyet 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Matter/energy has always existed and always will. The universe oscillates like a giant slinky. It is either expanding or contracting 99.99999999+% of the time. The other two options are the big bang and the big pause. Current calculations show that there is insufficient matter for a gravitational collapse, but the mass of neutrinos, free quarks, and other lepton like particles wasn't taken into account. Dark matter mass also confuses as it is not measurable at the current time. In another 33-38 billion years the big pause will occur and matter and energy will be drawn together as the big bang force is expended and gravity takes over.
The origin theory comes from contaminated minds.
2007-03-12 21:37:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The only logical answer is that it was created from beyond the point of the bang from a point of negative singularity which to the scientist this would mean from nonexistence. To everyone else this should open the door to a transcendent intelligence based on the information we have on the evidence of the observable acts of an intelligence this side of the bang. Especially when you consider that at some point consciousness was made possible and causality dictates a pre-existent consciousness as a pattern for the present reality.
2007-03-12 21:20:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by messenger 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well we know for a FACT that all of the matter came from a central point. Due to Radiation scatterings etc. But what happened before the bang? no one really knows.
Oh comon what does that last sentence prove? What's your excuse? Oh god did everything because you can't explain it. Talk about backward logic.( Also are you asking about the Big bang or evolution? Both don't relate to each other so don't mush it up into one thing. )
2007-03-12 21:12:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by Skeptic123 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Asking how the universe was created is like asking how God came to be. And I find it hard to believe that "He's always been...God is eternal" That's just a cheap way of answering a question know one knows the answer too...and I don't care what the bible says, at some point...there was nothing...completely emptiness. Know one can answer where God came from, so why should should anyone have to even try to explain the creation of the universe.
I have an idea, but it involve Einsteins theories of gravity, and black holes, and most people don't know much about that stuff, and I don't feel like confusing anyone, so I wont go into it. But really, I have no idea, just like you don't have a real answer to give me about the creation of God.
2007-03-12 21:20:14
·
answer #6
·
answered by abacus314 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
That is the usual question about why there is something rather than nothing. There is no answer, and saying god did it only pushes it back one stage.
Edit:
We know with fairly good certainty what happened microseconds after the Big Bang, it is rather question begging to talk about what happened before then if that truly was the beggining of time. Again the question of why there is something rather than nothing regardless of origin is not helped by invoking god, the same question can be asked of him.
And you do not seem to be reading the answers, we do not and cannot ever know why there is something rather than nothing, the question simply makes no sense.
And how this links to evolution is beyond me, why can't you say exactly the same thing about gravity or the photo-electric effect.
2007-03-12 21:12:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by fourmorebeers 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Genesis only states the beginning of this planet earth..not the whole universe. Before God say "Let there be light", the earth its without form, dark, and has waters (Genesis 1:2)..meaning it's already in there..only without form.
How about the beginning of the other galaxies?
I strongly believe that human mind cannot ever comprehend the vast dominions of God. That's one of the reasons why this body, including our mind, should be change into incorruptible..so that we can fully grasp His explanations later on.
But, for the mean time, we are given the knowledge and wisdom to study and appreciate it. Scientists are big help in collaborating what the Bible says. But their findings must be in conformity to what was already laid out by the Bible. But everyone is free to oppose. That's how truth comes out.
Only the One who set up everything can explain it to us. I have more questions to Him when He comes again the second time.
2007-03-12 21:54:48
·
answer #8
·
answered by Kaluluwa 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
If I weren't a Christian (which I am) or a scientist (which I'm not so that's easy) and I were to objectively look at the two theories of the Big Bang followed by Darwinism vs Creationism I'm pretty sure I would have to say that this world was created, not an accident. The complexity of our universe, our bodies, and every aspect of our physical world is too much for me to accept as being coincidence. Which theory really requires more blind faith?
2007-03-12 21:21:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Matter can spontaneously appear. It comes into existence when a particle and anti-particle come into existence in an otherwise empty space. There is no net gain in energy or matter in the universe as these particles cancel each other out. It defies no law of physics, there is not a net increase in the amount of matter in the unverse. The Big Bang could have been such an event on an extremely macro scale. It requires no god, no magic and no pre-existing matter.
2007-03-12 21:14:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by Deirdre H 7
·
2⤊
1⤋