If we give back the Golan Heights to the Syrians we can start digging our own graves. The Golan provides Israel with precious water, keeps the Syrians at bay, and a good strategic point. Before the Golan became part of Israel the Syrians would fire rocket into Israel on daily basis. Once, it fell into Israeli control the firing of the rockets stopped. I hope that Israel will never give them away.
2007-03-13 12:56:24
·
answer #1
·
answered by Teacher 4
·
7⤊
3⤋
sure. certainly that's a clever diction to furnish the Golan heights decrease back to the Syrians.As for protection, the cost of the Golan heights is turning out to be much less effective with the recent procedures of war and weapons.As for the economic device, the Golan heights isa undesirable section from the rural edge in comparison with different aspects.A peace treaty with the Syrians which incorporates giving decrease back the Golan heights to the Syrians is greater rewarding for the two factors.
2016-10-02 00:46:42
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm German and muslim, and I don't think Israel will give the Golans back to Syria. Ever.
The reason: Whoever controls the Golans, controls both Israel and Syria. So in the mindset of the Middle East, having the Golans is worth much more than a peace treaty with Syria. (You probably know the saying: Papers have patience. Waepaons don't need it.)
2007-03-12 14:14:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by t_maia2000 6
·
6⤊
0⤋
I have a friend in the UN who was in Syria some time ago, and he believes that Assad doesn't want to gain the Golan Heights, because having it as a "flag" to rally his people around is worth more than actually having it.
When Israel pulled out of parts of the West Bank and Gaza last year, the rockets from the Hamas started raining down. Giving land has never given peace. It's politics...
If getting land and nation for the Palestinian people were all it was about, the problem would have been solved long ago. The super-rich Arab nations who scream about the Israelis haven't lifted a finger to help the Palestinians, or spent a dollar to give them real aid; not for the people themselves, excluding the militant minority. Look at how the Palestinians were treated by the Kuwaitis. Not all of them of course, but the majority lived as servants and second class citizens.
So what is the point of the enmity between Syria and Israel? Syria likes having a scapegoat; the issue keeps him in power.
2007-03-13 09:07:04
·
answer #4
·
answered by softttlyy 2
·
5⤊
2⤋
From a purely theoretical and hypothetical viewpoint, if giving the Golan Heights would ensure eternal peace with the Syrians, then yes. However, this includes no aggression of any kind, no support of any kind for terror, including turning a blind-eye to smugglers of weapons, no support of another Muslim country in a war with Israel, the Syrian government staying eternally in power, open borders, a populace that would not be hostile to visiting Israelis and a fair distribution of the water of the area. All of these things are not possible, or at least there is no reason to assume they are. Once again though, in theory if it would ensure eternal peace (as defined above) then yes, I would give it back.
2007-03-13 04:08:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by Michael J 5
·
8⤊
1⤋
simply put I would never trust the Syrians enough to give back the Golan Heights.
Even if this current leadership wanted to make peace I cannot trust what will happen 50 years down the road.
Israel was able to make a peace treaty with Jordan without losing the West Bank. They were also made peace with Egypt without seceding Gaza. Why can it not do the same with Syria when it comes to the Golan?
Oh also I would not curse at you. I have no reason to do so
2007-03-13 03:07:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by Gamla Joe 7
·
5⤊
4⤋
Real classy, that last statement of yours.
As for the question, absolutely not! We won the Golan Heights fair and square. They're the source of most of our country's precious drinking water and also serve as a valuable strategic location, which, if it were to fall under Syrian control, would put all of northern Israel into harm's way.
2007-03-13 02:11:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
4⤋
I wouldn't, if it were up to me.
If I knew that the Syrians are truly into the peace idea with Israel, I'd let them visit the Golan Heights as much as they want to, but it would still belong to Israel.
Wars happen, and land gets annexed, what country (besides Israel) ever gave land back? That is insane.
2007-03-13 02:12:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
4⤋
Well, I don't know how we could help you. Maybe you should ask the government. Wow, I have a feeling you were assuming that people would curse Arabs and muslims.
2007-03-12 22:40:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by -♦One-♦-Love♦- 7
·
4⤊
1⤋
If they gave our Golan for peace that will be great, and peace will happen, then the jewish will be able to live among us after all what they did.
if they didn't and that's what i think, they will pay a huge cost, cause they are very wrong if they thought that Syrian will give up their land..
We have many ways to make Israel feels the pain, depending on our ability to move, we think that the liberty of Golan is so near, by peace or by fire, Our Golan will back, weather the God for Zionist accepted that or not, it's not a choice for them.
Arabic people are always ready to die for their land, cause they born here, they belong to it, but how can the Israel die for Golan and he knows it doesn't belong to him. they came to live, and they are so chicken to think of dying for their land, they are using high Technology and advanced military, that's all, but inside them, they are chicken..
Syrian are alone, and they depend on them selves to update their army, and believe me, we are doing very well, cause every day we dream for liberation day, we work for it, we live for it. we will do it.
2007-03-13 10:31:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by Alloush 2
·
2⤊
5⤋