Ie most of mine and attiudes are based around the facts of what pretty much all those I knew growing up did, and their parents and how unrealistic said parents view of the world was.
Ie they all thought their little darlings never dis lots of things I saw them do.
Then I saw what hurt them and what didnt and base most posts here on that.
its not due to some pervey crap.
I dont operate on normal, strange, oh somone thinks this so must be pervery or right or moral or immoral.
Just on whether I see actions hurt people or make them happy.
Why is that seen as wrong.?
Ie if I see a particalar relationship make peoplehappy I think that cant be abusive eveyone must be lying as they are all happy togther.
Ie say a 15 year old and an 18 year old if they seem happy together I think cool. Happy mates.
Now none of those I hung out w
Whilst if I see organisations everyone think are moral hurting people I regard that as abusive and hurtful.
Ie the church.
2007-03-12
13:39:12
·
10 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Pregnancy & Parenting
➔ Parenting
So why do parents operate on mass hysteria and group imagination. Ignore why people say they think certain things and make up insinuations like oh somone 30 plus taking about teenager realtioships must be a creep...
Why not operate on the babsis that hey actually thats what we were like when we were that age hes just telling the truth.
2007-03-12
13:40:42 ·
update #1
Ie if I say absteinance and people waiting is bad, its as mates were crying or suicidal or unhappy.
If I say insicents of young fresh out of uni teachers and 6th formers are not a problem its as Ive had mates in that age group date anyway meeting at parties or nightclubs so seems fine. And also seeing documentries about said couples on a see where they are now and many were happily married.
So I think heyhow can that be abusive or peado like if they got married and happy now everyone left them alone.
reminds me of movies like Dirty Dancing where the mad parents cant stand their daughter growing up and ending up with the Patrick Swase character.
Instead of sidign with the nasty break couples up parents I think like what if that were my mates.
So why do I cop flack like oh thats strange he must think this when I o others say no we think this due to that. etc.
2007-03-12
13:44:41 ·
update #2
***************
its not even their point of view it seems to be like oh mates all think this.
or in terms or whats normal and not instead of whats hurting and wahts not.
Why have any normals or stranges.
Most of the nicest people I met where anything but the norm
Ie the gays, goths, porn stars, metallers, ravers, wacky hair do guys, etc all were the nice ones.
And its all the puritian, so called normal types who are nasty to others
2007-03-12
13:47:20 ·
update #3
example gandalf talking about mushrooms. Clearly nutty instead of being mature and thinking realisitically.
Ill bet most of his mates slept around and did drugs.
Yet when older will all be hypocritcal and say oh drugs are evil and all kids doing them should be arrested
2007-03-12
13:48:42 ·
update #4
*******************
Its saying zin if you read properly.
Dont think in terms of normal, abnormal, whay would people of this age think this or that, if they think this they must pbe perves etc...
Its saying if people say they think a certain way and give resons just beleive them, dont try and second guess them and insinuate stuff.
And judge people by are they hurting others unjustly or not.
Ie if your daughter picks somone for a boyfriend and both get on like a house on fire but say shes a little under age or over age and hes like her teacher of dentist.
Just operate on the basis of are they a happy couple or not.
2007-03-12
13:52:08 ·
update #5
Tia who is what I say not making sense.
ie whats not sense in ...
If a couple is happy together it must be a good thing even if breaking rules
2007-03-12
14:23:14 ·
update #6