2007-03-12 13:13:42 · 14 answers · asked by Midge 7 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
No... that's the trouble with tribbles...
2007-03-12 13:18:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are you a Real Trekkie, or a hypocritical Trekkie ?
Every True Trekkie knows that Tribbles can self-replicate.
So if Noah did take any, it only had to be one tribble.
Hey, no offense intended of course {on the hypocritical trekkie stuff).
This Star Trek appreciation week is great.
With Metta {loving-kindness and friendship) !
2007-03-12 13:48:03 · answer #2 · answered by Thomas 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO!!!!!
Can you imagine our ecosystem if they had been real creatures on this earth. Imagine Noah and the family going to the food bin on the ark and finding it full of Tribbles. What would the poor elephants eat? But at least the carnivores would have had a feast!!
2007-03-12 13:41:25 · answer #3 · answered by Searcher 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Tribbles were fiction, and are a rehash of the "flat cats" of Heinlein's novel The Rolling Stones. Noah, or at least the flood, is also fiction.
2007-03-12 13:18:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
silly. tribbles are from the future.
2007-03-12 13:20:25 · answer #5 · answered by a 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I wish!
Your question reminds me of the comics I have cut out and saved about Noah and the Ark.
Thanks for the smile.
2007-03-12 13:50:12 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i am really really bored to prove that Noah's ark as fantasy but i will leave some of my friends to explain
2007-03-12 13:18:14 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I don't know. I know the punk took two mosquito's with him
2007-03-13 05:11:06 · answer #8 · answered by Alley C 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If he did he had to leave a couple of dinosaurs behind.
2007-03-12 13:18:16 · answer #9 · answered by pistolero 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. YOu only need one. Didn't you watch that episode?
2007-03-12 13:18:29 · answer #10 · answered by Skeptic123 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋