2007-03-12 11:23:10 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Haggard could have sex with animals on live TV and still win. No matter what Dawkins says, the response will always be, "Uh, yeah, whatever, but you don't believe in Jeeesus do ya smartass?".
2007-03-12 11:32:59 · answer #1 · answered by ThePeter 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
In the United States, Ted Haggard would probably win, unfortunately.
And not just because Dawkins isn't a citizen.
2007-03-12 11:28:01 · answer #2 · answered by WWTSD? 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Ted Haggard merely admitted that he replaced into incorrect while all innovations to ward off his accuser have been long gone. He maintained his innocence, very corresponding to bill Clinton, till the info grew to become so overwhelming that he had no recourse in mincing words. that isn't a individual of real integrity or backbone. Richard Dawkins, on the different hand, has admitted to blunders that he has made interior the previous. You apparently haven’t listened to any of his scientific lectures, the place he recognizes defective assumptions that he has made in the previous. instead of becoming simplistic caricatures of folk, enable us to guard the linked fee of their techniques, and decide those instead. as quickly as we use techniques by way of fact the litmus attempt to degree the properly worth of a guy, Richard Dawkins comes out far greater advantageous to a guy like Ted Haggard.
2016-12-14 17:25:03 · answer #3 · answered by sherburne 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Richard Dawkins would secretly hire a group to follow Ted around and naturally would find him with his gay meth provider days before the elections. Then they would sell those pics to newspapers and news channels. So Richard Dawkins would win.
2007-03-12 11:31:16 · answer #4 · answered by Ayesha 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I doubt Dawkins would win much. People want someone who can offer answers not just pose rhetorical questions. Example If God made man why didn't he make him with two anuses so he could crap more efficiently. Not very well designed if a creator truly exists. This really doesn't do much to solve peoples problems where the live.
2007-03-12 11:31:10 · answer #5 · answered by Edward J 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sadly Ted Haggard would,
Think about it, most people are pretty stupid.
Average IQ is only 100.
That's why people still have blind faith in our supposed "democracy" and keep voting in the fascist corporate establishment government duopoly system; good cop/bad cop ie. dem/repub.
I wonder if people even know there's more and better choices at all.
2007-03-12 11:28:35 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Still Too many conservative pricks in this country. Haggard would get over 300 of the electoral votes.
2007-03-12 11:30:09 · answer #7 · answered by Armund Steel 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know which might be more popular, but Dawkins is a genius, and Haggard definitely is not.
2007-03-12 11:29:26 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I fear Haggard would win. My vote would undoubtedly be for Mr. Dawkins!
2007-03-12 11:26:42 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
LOL, which would be the lesser of two evils for the many christian voters? I bet on Ted, it is obvious he no longer "chooses" to be gay.
2007-03-12 11:26:26 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋