2007-03-12 08:57:02 · 9 answers · asked by Aintitthetruth 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
saving as in their physical life. unsaved in the second part as in there spiritual soul.
2007-03-12 09:02:25 · update #1
I read a story about that happening (I don't know if it was true or where I read it). It was in a boating accident and the father could either save his son or his son's friend, but not both. Knowing his sons faith in God and his friend not having that faith he saved his sons friend. The story went on to say that the friend was converted and became a preacher. So, one day they will all be in heaven together.
I would hope that if ever I'm in that same situation I would do the same.
2007-03-12 09:11:03 · answer #1 · answered by V 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If at all possible, I would try to save them both. If only one would be physically saved, then I would have to rescue the unsaved man. As long as he is alive, he still has a chance to make the right decision. It would be the right choice, and the one that my saved loved ones would expect me to make.
2007-03-12 16:06:47 · answer #2 · answered by Cylon Betty 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
So the saved person needs saving, you didn't think out this question did you?
2007-03-12 16:05:12 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know about moral.The natural thing to do is save the loved one.
2007-03-12 16:03:28 · answer #4 · answered by Dr. NG 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Saved from what?
2007-03-12 16:02:27 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would try to save them both and sacrifice myself instead.
2007-03-12 16:00:24 · answer #6 · answered by Yogini 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Christian morals would have you try to save both, or die trying.
(John 15:13)
2007-03-12 16:04:08 · answer #7 · answered by great gig in the sky 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What is this "saved" of which you speak?
2007-03-12 16:00:06 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
There is no such thing as a soul. Save yourself!
2007-03-12 16:08:32 · answer #9 · answered by shrill alarmist, I'm sure 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋