How could US justify its dropping of Atom Bombs on Hiroshima & Nagasalki?

Question

It may be recalled that :
1.The war ended in the European theatre on 8th May, 1945.
2.Representatives of 50 nations signed the Charter of the
UN, at SanFrancisco on 26th June,1945.
3. Big Three Allied leaders met at Potsdam(Germany) on 24th
July,1945. They agreed on the peace settlement
with Germany and drew up plans forJapan's surrender and
occupation.
How , then, Truman could order dropping of atom bomb on
Hiroshima on the 13th day after Potsdam Conference and on 16th on Nagasaki?

Answer 1

Japan refused to surrender unconditionally.

Answer 2

Because Japan had not surrendered, at the times of 18 May, 1945, 26 June 1945 and 24 July 1945 nor at the times we dropped the bomb on Hiroshima or on Nagasaki. These 2 bombs, by killing thousands of people and forcing Japan's surrender-saved perhaps a million lives that would have been lost if we would have had to invade Japan. Comprendo?

Answer 3

The justification of this is twofold.

First, there is suggestion that the hard-line militaristic faction in Japan had usurped the Emperor's control, and that he was unable to request his people surrender. By this logic, the military would fight to a full invasion of Japan, which would have been horrendous both for the United States and Japan. Of course, the details of this are murky, and it is suggested that Japan would have surrendered if the United States allowed the single condition that the Emperor keep his throne (which was latter allowed, but not accepted as a condition of surrender, we wanted unconditional surrender.)

2- Russia. The Soviet Union had "joined" the war against Japan in the days leading up to the atomic bombing. The United States did not want Communist influence holding portions of Japan, or the remaining portion of Korea (at the time, a Japanese colony), and we were also interested in making sure they knew any struggle between the Communist and the free world would end up in complete annihilation of Russia.

The fact that we used two nuclear bombs is unforgivable. The first one in itself was inhuman and a terrible mistake, although we had little idea just how truly devastating it was. The fact that we did this again was our true error, utilizing such a terrible weapon on our fellow man even after we knew all too well just what it could do.

Answer 4

The reason generally given is that many more lives, possibly millions, would be lost and the war prolonged if we had invaded Japan using conventional weapons. As horrible as it was, some experts say that it actually saved many lives by only taking out 2 cities instead of the millions who would have lost their lives on both sides. The Japanese, although their country was in a shambles, was not about to surrender. This forced the surrender thus saving countless lives that would have been lost all over Japan, not just Heroshima and Nagasaki.

Answer 5

Not being sarcastic but since you have your dates and such, when did Japan sneak attack the US at Pearl Harbor? This has been what I was taught is that the US dropped that bomb due to the Pearl Harbor attack! And there were other leads to the fact that Japan had other intentions on future attacks. I don't justify any atomic bomb attack, but things were way different in that time!
Also, this is why the US has become so hard on nuclear power, the US regretted that bomb! Don't get me wrong, the US is taking measures to end nuclear power in the US as well but you have to think about why their actions were made!

Answer 6

(The source internet site isn't obtainable). there is not any indication that Japan replaced into approximately to offer up. The conflict of Okinawa confirmed the confirm of the jap human beings to combat to the very end. they might have defended the abode islands to the final guy or woman. Casualties on the two factors could have been horrendous, plenty greater effective than the 200,000 that have been killed in the two atomic bomb detonations. i'm no longer able to assert the U.S. replaced into justified in dropping the a-bombs, maybe common carpet bombing of the vast jap cities might have led to a resign over the years. it may desire to have additionally led to an more advantageous loss of lives interior the long-term. The onus is in having the excellence of being the only united states of america to apply A-bombs against civilian objectives. understanding the effects that the bombs might have, it is not a call that i will have made myself. (My spouse is jap, she lived some miles south of the traditional aim of Kokura Arsenal, age 3, while that undertaking replaced into aborted and the planes proceeded to the secondary aim, Nagasaki. I shudder on the assumption-approximately there being a sparkling sky over Kokura Arsenal that day).

Answer 7

I notice that you conveniently leave out the fact that Japan refused to accept surrender thereby rendering the Potsdam Declaration as useless as the leaflets it was written on. The justification is simple, it was war.

Answer 8

you can draw up plans all you want. If Japan pooh poohed the plans then the war continues. Yes we were justified. We would have only dropped one if the Japanese would have surrendered, but they didn't, so #2 was dropped. a #3 was waiting in the wings.

Answer 9

Because they still needed to get what was coming to them. They didn't think twice when they bombed Pearl Harbor and killed thousands of servicemen and destroyed numerous ships and military equipment. I think they got off pretty easy. We should have wiped out the whole island.

Answer 10

Because they could. I don't mean to be flippant, but the Japanese were not surrendering, and our soldiers were being slaughtered on these little islands. Many lives were saved on both sides because of Truman's decision.