Does science and religion go hand in hand ?

Question

I often ask questions about science and religion . I sometimes get answers saying science and religion go hand in hand . What is exactly going hand in hand with these two things ?

Answer 1

Yes they do.

In the quest for answers, we need to be guided by sound principles. Unless we stick to the highest standards of evidence, we can easily be misled in our search for scientific and religious truth. Realistically, none of us can begin to evaluate all scientific knowledge and ideas, which today fill huge libraries. On the other hand, the Bible provides a manageable compendium of spiritual teachings for our consideration. The Bible is well supported by known facts

Answer 2

For many Christians, science and religion do tend go hand-in-hand. For example, they assert that evolution perhaps is true (science) but that God started this evolutionary process (religion). Things such as this can be accurate in a scientific sense but still fit within the scope of the Bible. Not all Christians feel this way, and many discredit science that contradicts the Bible. However, according to those that believe the former, essentially science doesn't contradict the Bible, but rather fits within it's framework.

Answer 3

Nothing, they're opposites. Science requires evidence and nothing stops it from trampling religious claims.
After ignoring human history and the definition of science I guess someone could come to the uneducated conclusion that science and religion goes hand in hand.

Answer 4

Science and religion are the two great seekers of truth. No genuine truth provided by one of them can ever conflict with any genuine truth provided by the other. Truth cannot conflict with truth. Unfortunately, science is much more unified in its truth than religion is. There are many scientific principles that are universally accepted as true and correct by scientists. There are no religious principles that are universally accepted by all religions. That's why the specific beliefs of some religions may conflict with the discoveries of science, just as they conflict with the beliefs of other religions. Which simply indicates that these specific religious beliefs are not genuine truth.
.

Answer 5

This sort of question really only related to fundamentalist Christianity as all the other religions recognise and sensibly debate science and scientific fact. It really is only fundamentalist Christians that stick to the idea that they are right and everyone else is wrong.

Answer 6

I've said for over twenty years that I firmly believe that when Science finally peers over the crest of the mountain, it will find that Religion has been sitting there waiting for it all along.

I believe that when someone says "The two go hand in hand," it's stating that it's not really a choice between science and religion...some people don't find the two to be mutually exclusive. Some people (like me) are able to reconcile their scientific knowledge with their religious beliefs.

For me, science bolsters my religious beliefs.

Answer 7

I believe that one can not exist without the other. I believe that GOD created this world and everything in it. HE put everything in motion and has allowed us a free hand in doing great damage to it. Hopefully, at some point in time we will begin to clean up the environmental messes that we keep making. Everything that has come about in science and is proven is also a part of GOD's WORK. Have a great day and a wonderful week!
Thanks,
Eds

Answer 8

Does technology and faith pass hand in hand? faith constantly deals with the perception of a author god. on condition that there are various faiths that exist during this international, there are certain to be Religions that conflict with one yet another and hence, technology can't coach faith itself. rather, technology can attempt questions and issues that upward push up after thorough analyze and commentary. technology follows something referred to as the “medical approach,” wherein a question will stick to a collection of steps as a manner to attain a end or concept. while the tip has shown the hypothesis or tentative clarification to be best, you create a concept. the belief then runs throughout the approach back to attempt new hypothesis. A concept is supported by making use of a multitude of evidence accumulated by way of many observations of test (Ex. Atomic concept). If a concept is in no way shown incorrect, that's going to become a regulation (Ex. Newton’s regulation of action). on condition that faith relies basically on faith, and technology relies basically on certainty and evidence accumulated by way of many, many experiments and observations, faith and technology can't pass “hand-in-hand.” yet another piece that provides to my stance during this argument is something referred to as “Occam's razor” wherein, in technology, the belief with the least anomalies or issues is deemed the right and best determination. the belief, faith, with the main anomalies is deemed the incorrect determination. on condition that all Religions have an identical volume of evidence, that's impossible for technology to back any of them up with medical analyze.

Answer 9

hell no! science is anti-religion. religion is anti-science. most religious people say that you are not to question God but on the other hand science says to question everything, even the things that you know to be true so you will without a doubt know that it is certain!

Answer 10

I have recently come to believe the two are of one and the same. They both seem to search the same questions for the same answers.Just my opinion as now.