Are you smoking crack ? AIRBUS is 10 years ( order wise ) behind Boeing - they have Capitulated the whole middle market to Boeing - this has re-energized Boeing - there is no stopping the Giant now that it has awoke. Even the 747s are flying off the shelves. Read the story about the DC-10 vs the L1011 - this is what has happened to AIRBUS - in this business - it is who grabs the market share - there will not be enough market share for AIRBUS to recover - it will be another public works program for Europeans based on subsidy,..
2007-03-15 15:48:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by thefatguythatpaysthebills 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
There will most likely still be two major western aviation companies in 20 years time. Boeing had some hard years recently, consistently losing to Airbus, right now they are making the most of the issues at Airbus.
I'd say Boeing are ahead, at least in the media campaign, right now and will remain so for some time. Unless the 787 body sections from Kawasaki and Fuji don't go together with the rest as planned.
The 787 and A380 don't compete, they are just the current development tasks of the two companies. The A350 competes with the 787 and the 747-800 might be seen as a competitor with the A380.
2007-03-12 05:05:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by Chris H 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Boeing has passed Airbus and is out front. In their effort to build "the biggest" Airbus didn't realise that although there is going to be a need for higher capasity planes in the forseeable future, and the public is used to and expects wide bodied air liners, but the modern traveler is not looking to get on a huge airliner that holds hundreds of people and might take an hour and a half to load.The flying public has seen big planes and are looking for convernience and avoiding large hub airports.
2007-03-13 23:38:47
·
answer #3
·
answered by ericbryce2 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Airbus is the company behind on production schedules.
Boeing has capture many of the carriers that were waiting for the A380.
Yes, Boeing has benefitted greatly from the problems at Airbus.
2007-03-12 03:27:26
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anthony M 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
this question returned? This, as has been mentioned, must be argued approximately perpetually, and a number of the factors of argument are very subjective. Airbus is definitely held to be extra prestigious in lots of areas of the international: many Asian kinfolk airlines certainly state this! Boeings are plenty extra probably to be seen as the two kit to get the job completed (which they do), or farm animals vans (a particularly straightforward euphemism reserved for the 747) Your declare to Boeing being extra matured is specious: the agencies that shaped Airbus have been airplane builders themselves. Douglas pioneered airline traveling, no longer Boeing, with the DC-3: probably the 1st "international" airplane in that it become equipped in great nubers and served exceedingly plenty everywhere- and nonetheless does. optimistic the Boeing airplane got here out first, however the DC-3 become a workhorse. The B-17, P-38 and different warbirds are irrelevant previous nostalgia. The British ought to as easily declare that the Avro Lancaster become extra famous, as though this is a appropriate way of judging an airplane builder. protection? in case you think of for one 2d that the two employer slacks off right here, you would be very incorrect. Like autos, older airplane are in lots of cases a made of their use and high quality of maintenance particularly than something. for that reason, there are numerous extra dodgy Boeings in the air. convenience? this is extra a function of the airline and this is chosen cabin outfit. Flying one hundred cases a 300 and sixty 5 days and extra, i elect via airlines, no longer the airplane style. Boeing is likewise broke. Airbus is likewise suffering. neither is financially sound relatively. Boeing lives off subsidies from the U. S. protection rigidity (ok, they are no longer formally referred to as subsidies, yet that's what they effectively are). Airbus additionally gets subsidies, and so what?
2016-11-24 22:12:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Boeing seems to be doing pretty fine now with all cooperation (unwilling, though) from Airbus.
The question would be, will Airbus be able to make up for its lost time on Boeing?
2007-03-12 13:57:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
What Anthony said. It's Airbus that is flying behind the power curve (or production curve, in this case). If they ever have to fly the coop and operate without the multinational government subsidies to sustain them, they could be in [even] big[ger] trouble.
2007-03-12 04:54:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by Ryan 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
LOL.... Airbus A380 is one wait the biggest passenger jet in the world.
787 is one of the most luxurious plane i've seen
2007-03-12 11:13:18
·
answer #8
·
answered by charanjit n 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes i think they do but they have alot ot work on
2007-03-13 05:54:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by Syrian4life 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
ooohhh ya they doing good..
2007-03-12 04:00:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by eviot44 5
·
0⤊
0⤋