English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

towards other country when Muhammad invade Tibet in Guge the center of buddhism because of that the Guge civilization collapsed

2007-03-12 02:40:10 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

10 answers

I don't have a clue about any of this

2007-03-20 00:33:48 · answer #1 · answered by naseldrip 4 · 0 0

It's okay. All things are impermanent. All things change. Consider Nalanda Monastery. It used to be the biggest center of learning with over 20,000 students - now not even a speck remains. It would be silly to think that we would not suffer the same fate. Think over and over about the preciousness of your own human life. Think about how difficult it is to have reached the age you are now and how only through the kindness of others have you reached this level of education and good fortune to be able to use a computer and read this response or type a question. For countless eons, humans have been abusing each other out of attachment and greed. You can only see that it doesn't happen in you and try and inspire others to not do harmful actions.

2007-03-12 10:30:51 · answer #2 · answered by shrill alarmist, I'm sure 4 · 0 1

What happened long time back in the past is generally a creation of imagination. We do not have authentic video recording of what happened and how. To debate on that basis would not be fruitful exercise. But we know that there had been inter-religion fights. Men needed to fight to establish superiority even in the last century and that tradition continues. People fight wars for supremacy. They often do it in the garb of religion. We must find out how to make all people accept non-violent, non-ethical methods to establish superiority, really if any, of one group over another. The medieval habits have to go.

2007-03-19 19:00:09 · answer #3 · answered by sensekonomikx 7 · 0 0

What are you talking about?

Muhammad has never been to Tibet before. I guess you might be talking about Muslims in India.

2007-03-19 12:54:32 · answer #4 · answered by Bionimetiket 2 · 0 0

From where have you got this late news which is unknown to the rest of the world?

2007-03-19 07:07:46 · answer #5 · answered by shahinsaifullah2006 4 · 1 1

we are all human. we lie, steal, manipulate, covet other mens wives, cheat on our husbands, kill. if we believed every humans writings in history we would also be very stupid and gullible, and those people are out there too.............

2007-03-20 08:55:59 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Muhammad was a lier and a tool of satan, the only way to heaven is to repent of your sins and follow Christ.

2007-03-12 09:44:27 · answer #7 · answered by JesusFreak 4 · 4 3

The True Miracle


(a) "And the Blessed One replied: Is it not a wonderful thing, mysterious and miraculous to the worldling, that a sinner can become a saint, that he who attains to true enlightenment will find the path of truth and abandon the evil ways of selfishness? The Bhikshu who renounces the transient pleasures of the world for the eternal bliss of holiness, performs the only miracle that can truly be called a miracle." (The Gospel of Buddha by Carus. p. 151.)

(b) "On one occasion some of his adherents entreated the Buddha to permit his missionaries to work wonders, as that would elevate them in the eyes of others. The Buddha replied as follows: 'There are three kinds of miracles. The first is the miracle of power, in which extraordinary power is manifested. as in walking on water, exorcising devils, raising the dead, and so forth. When the believer sees such things his faith may become deepened, but it would not convince the unbeliever, who might think these things are done by the aid of magic. I therefore see danger in such miracles, and I regard them as shameful and repulsive. The second is the miracle of prophecy. such as thought-reading, sooth-saying, fortune-telling, etc. Here also there would be disappointment, for these too in the eyes of the unbeliever would be no better than extraordinary magic. The last is the miracle of instruction. When any of my disciples brings round a man by instruction to rightly employ his intellectual powers, that is the true miracle.'" (The Essence of Buddhism by Narasu. pp. 51-2. Kevadda Sutta quoted.)

Mohammed was conscious that he was given the true miracle, the miracle of instruction. His instruction is the Koran, and it speaks of itself:-

(1) "Say, Verily, if men and genii were purposely assembled, that they might produce (a book) like this Koran, they could not produce (one) like unto it, although the one of them assisted the other." (XVII. p. 281.)

(2) "If ye be in doubt concerning the revelation which We have sent down to Our servant, produce a chapter like unto it, and call upon your witnesses besides God, if ye say truth. But if ye do (it) not, nor shall (ever be able to) do (it), justly fear the fire whose fuel is men and stones, prepared for the unbelievers." (II. p. 4.)

The Koran calls its verses signs:-

"(1) When Our evident signs are recited unto them they who hope not to meet Us (at resurrection). say, Bring a different Koran from this or make some change therein." (X. p. 200)

(2) "(The unbelievers) say, Unless he comes unto us with a sign from his Lord, (we will not believe on him). Hath not a plain declaration come unto them of that which (is contained) in the former volumes (of scripture, by the revelation of the Koran) ?" (XX. p. 315.)

(3) "Thus do We send down (the Koran) being evident signs." (XXII. p. 328)

(4) "The same (the Koran is) evident aigns." (XXIX. p. 392)

"Mohammed's opponents answered this by requiring him to work a miracle in proof of his Divine mission, but he refused saying that he was sent to preach the truth, and not to work miracles, appealing at the same time, to the Koran, he challenged his adversaries to produce any work that could rival it in lbeauty and sublimity. No proof has been adduced that Mohammed at any time descended to any artifices or pseudo miracles to enforce his doctrines or to establish his apostolic claim. He appears on the contrary 'to have relied entirely upon reason............" (The Apology for Mohammed and Koran by Davenport. p. 19.)

The prophet himself gave out that he was given the Koran as a sign:-

(1) "Abu Hurera relates :- The apostle of God said, 'Every apostle was given the same signs that were given to the apostle before him, and people believed on them. But the sign given to me is the Koran that God of power and glory has revealed to me....'" (M. Vol. 1. p. 256.)

(2) "Abu Hurera relates :-The apostle of God said, 'Among the apoatles there is none who is not given miracles in order to make people believe on him, and I am being given the revelation sent down by God............'" (Ta. Vol. V. p. 34. B. and M. quoted.)

Neither Jesus nor Shankaracharya calls hls instruction a sign, but Mohammed who Is the Buddha Maitreya, calls his instruction a sign.

2007-03-16 20:24:58 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

I will say, don't believe in anything the muslums says.

2007-03-12 09:44:13 · answer #9 · answered by birdsflies 7 · 4 2

PEACEFUL? HA HA

2007-03-20 07:24:33 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers