well....i probably spend too much time on both.....but which is worse??
2007-03-11 15:40:58 · 14 answers · asked by Pointe Your Toes! 3 in Health ➔ Mental Health
Both, you need to spend more time outside with nature.. your brain needs air.. and time to think
2007-03-11 15:45:42 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I say it depends on the content.
If you are watching educational television, and actually learning something, it isn't that bad. A continuous diet of soap operas, sitcoms and other ilk would be NO.
Same for computer. Repetitious games based on random action and not thinking = NO. Yahoo! Answers is OK, but maybe not just the Polls and Surveys section - branch out.
Pick things that challenge you.
2007-03-11 15:48:24 · answer #2 · answered by KirksWorld 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
the perception in the back of this question is that there is now extra violence than there was. this is questionable. the point of violence in a society fluctuates, and over the whole international there'll continuously be extra or much less violent places. that there is extra violence in the Western international than there become 50 years in the past seems to be real, yet there is plenty under there become in the middle an prolonged time, the Tudor era or the 18thC. traditionally conversing we are residing in a somewhat non violent section and era. someplace else in the international of path issues are diverse. As for the function of television etc. there is something in what you assert - yet lot under you think. The ingenious arts continuously mirror their social context as much as (i think extra effective than) they effect it. They do, to a element, effect behaviour and attitudes; yet that element stops properly in need of causation. there is violence on television using fact babies to boot as adults want it, as they continuously have. The ballads of Robin Hood, the performs of Shakespeare, epics like Beowulf and the Iliad are packed with it. no longer plenty new right here different than the technologies used for the 21stC version - admittedly extra picture, yet no longer surprisingly extra influential.
2016-11-24 21:33:55 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Television. Without a doubt.
2007-03-11 15:49:26 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
TV.
With a computer you can engage more, write, learn new things, etc. Television is much more passive.
2007-03-11 16:00:27 · answer #5 · answered by Celi 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
TV for sure. Well depending on what you do online.
The Plug-in drug is a book that you probably can get at your library and it details all the reasons why TV is bad for you. And she is not even talking about content.
2007-03-11 15:52:20 · answer #6 · answered by Makemeaspark 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Television. You may actually learn something surfing the net.
2007-03-11 15:43:41 · answer #7 · answered by Gatekeeper 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
The worst is Computer. When you open computer you mostly do msn ,aim . maybe you will watch some nasty things.
that's why I said, Computer.
Computer is bad for children. There are lot of sex predators out there.
2007-03-11 15:45:52 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
you have less of many things with television:
control, input, movement, relationships.
i favor the computer.
2007-03-11 15:48:22 · answer #9 · answered by BonesofaTeacher 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
me to, use a time schedual, it will help get rid of the bad effects.
2007-03-11 15:58:05 · answer #10 · answered by dr s 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋