2007-03-11 15:12:00 · 29 answers · asked by kit_roamer 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
King James approved of the King James Version.
Jesus did not write any of the Bible it was written by many of his disciples and was Gods message until it was edited many times. You can learn more by studying the Council of Nicaea and how the Bible was "canonized" by the Catholic church and parts of it that they did not agree with were changed or destroyed. My suggestion is you study the history of the Bible. You may find yourself finding more questions than answers. I did and I finally found them.
2007-03-11 15:25:44 · answer #1 · answered by lovingmomhappykids 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jesus did not write any bible. The Bible Old and New Testament were both written by men of God's choosing and He breathed His words to them. King James version was not around during the time Jesus walked the earth. There was only the Torah. If it were not for the Catholic Church we would not have a New Testament. The KJV came along thousands of years later.KJV only has 66 books, the original Catholic Bible has 73 books
2007-03-11 15:19:31 · answer #2 · answered by tebone0315 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the unique manuscripts have not replaced. The King James version is a translation. often conversing, a "version" is a translation this is unique between others and keeps its call even after revisions (using fact the King James version has). So, the KJV is an English language translation particularly than an alteration from the unique texts. Getting extra on your question, the theory that the KJV is the only "inspired" English translation is a human custom that's no longer supported via scripture. Jesus warned of giving custom a similar weight as scripture. evaluate that as quickly as the Holy Spirit empowered believers to evangelise the Gospel to foreigners of their very own languages, they probably (besides the reality that the Bible would not specifically say) spoke to the persons in the modern-day dialects of the time particularly than archaic dialects. The Bible is likewise consistent in that God reaches out to human beings the place they are. additionally interesting of be conscious is that the KJV translators prolonged credit to previous English translations. they additionally blanketed footnotes for commerce translations of multiple words and passages to boot as blanketed the Apocrypha in the unique 1611 KJV. The KJV become additionally no longer easily gained with a heat welcome whilst it become first revealed. human beings attacked the character of King James as a million) an earthly monarch, and 2) as a individual who must be of unsavory character at cases. in actuality, the early KJV Bible gained a lot of a similar forms of criticisms as a clean translation that present day English translations receive on the instant from a good number of KJV-onlyists. God reaches out to human beings the place they are. there have been many, lots of people who've replied the call to salvation with a non-KJV Bible pointing the way. Peace be with you.
2016-11-24 21:31:42 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The King James version of the Bible was written 1584 years after the crucifixion of Jesus.
Didn't scripture say that Jesus read from the scrolls?
I have heard a lot of people say, 'If the King James was good enough for Jesus it is good enough for me".
grace2u
2007-03-11 15:20:08 · answer #4 · answered by Theophilus 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Nonsense. King James of England came a long, long time after Christ. He changed key elements of the bible to suit his own political and religious needs and those of his country as he saw it during his reign. The King James version of the bible is just that, his version. This version of the bible wasn't approved by Jesus, only King James and those who served him.
2007-03-11 15:19:46 · answer #5 · answered by teacupn 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Jesus didn't write one stitch of the Bible Himself.
A. The 66 books of the Bible were written:
1. On three continents.
2. In three languages.
3. By about 40 different people (kings, shepherds, scientists, attorneys, an army general, fishermen, priests, and a physician).
4. Over a period of about 1,500 years.
5. On the most controversial subjects.
6. By people who, in most cases, had never met.
7. By authors whose education and background varied greatly.
B. Yet, though it seems totally inconceivable,
1. The 66 books maintain harmony with each other.
2. Often new concepts on a subject are expressed, but these concepts do not undermine what other Bible writers say on the same subject
2007-03-11 15:18:14 · answer #6 · answered by I-o-d-tiger 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
That is a lie. The KJV was written after the Bible was compiled (by Constantine in the 200s, I think). The Bible was originally written in Hebrew (Old Testament) and Greek (New Testament). It was later translated into Latin. I think that KJV was the first translation of the Bible into English.
2007-03-11 15:26:12 · answer #7 · answered by Death of Reason 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
ASK HIM NEXT TIME WHAT LANGUAGE THE BIBLE WAS FIRST WROTE IN AND THEN SAY THAN THAT IS THE ORIGINAL THAT JESUS AUTHORIZED THEN RIGHT AND THEN TELL HIM THAT PEOPLE HAVE MORE IMPORTANT THINGS IN THIS WORLD TO THINK ABOUT AND ARGUE WITH THEN WHAT BIBLE TRANSLATION IS THE RIGHT ONE THEN TELL HIM THAT HE NEEDS TO GROW UP AND GO BUY A NEW KING JAMES VERSION AND THAT THAT ONE WAS THE ONLY ONE THAT WAS INTERPED FROM THE ORIGINAL SCROLLS AND WAS NOT CATHOLIC CORRUPTED
2007-03-11 15:22:08 · answer #8 · answered by THE WAR WRENCH 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
The king James version is the best one to read because
the other leave out some thing like king . now Jesus will
speak to you in tho and thy
2007-03-11 15:21:18 · answer #9 · answered by esther9364622 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i dont think jesus wrote that. his name appears nowhere in the scripture credits. i think king james found a version he was comfortable with, and thats the way it turned out. i think your minister has an intellect problem.
2007-03-11 15:23:38 · answer #10 · answered by chris l 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋