So, the scientific folks think that they have found Jesus bones.....????

Question

Also claim that he was married to Mary M. and they had a child named Judah. I find that amazing that they say they have positive evidence of this when no one can even find out who the father of Ana Nicole Smith's baby is.Any one else find this somewhat ridiculous? Oh and for those of you who will trash the question and say that it attacks my Christianity it doesn't so don't waste you time answering.

Nope I just think it is soo funny that Cameron thinks that he actually found Christ's tomb. When the names Jesus and Mary were common names back then and the family would not have had a burial tomb in Jerusalem where he was killed. Also he was from a poor family and the tomb was ornate for that time.

Since so many of you are bringing to my attention that it's not the "scientific folk" then I suppose I will call them the "whacko's?"

Well good, at tleast some of you do realize that it is a bunch of junk. I wanted to see reactions and boy did I get them. My point is exactly what a lot of you have said they have no way of knowing whose bones they found and certainly no way of proving them to be the bones of Christ.

Answer 1

No, James Cameron claims that he found Jesus' bones. James Cameron is a movie director.

And you obviously have no clue what people know about this given that this has been talked about for weeks and you are only just now posting about it so you probably heard some commercial on tv about it or something.

1. There are 9 other tombs in the area that have the same names. Jesus, Mary, and Judah were all very common names for that time.

2. The bodies in the tomb are NOT related by genetics so, the only way these two had a child is by adopting it.

Don't believe everything you read in the magazines and newspapers or what you see on tv. This is just Hollywood. Its what they do. If you haven't realized that by now, I feel bad for you because you must be gullible enough to actually believe that Britney Spears really is suffering from Post Partum Depression and thats why she went nuts.

When scientists DO find the tomb of Jesus Christ or Mary Magdalene, then the SCIENTISTS will be the ones to announce it NOT some Hollywood star bent on making money and causing as much of a stir as possible just like Hollywood has always done. Remember, Cameron hasn't really been in the news since Titanic. He had to make himself famous again. What better way to do that than freak everyone out?

That tomb was discovered 30 years ago and has already been debunked, but because it was on tv, some idiots have decided to believe it.

Answer 2

Amusing this was the theme of a movie some years back with Antonio Banderas called the body. I also wonder what this does to the Davinici code or the the other story holy blood holy grail. This really doesn't suprise me a little research and you will find this is only one of a long line of attempts to cast doubt on the life and resurrectio of Jesus. Few people however realise there is some other good boks out there and a number of the worlds most brilliant legal minds have come out in favour of believing the accounts of the gospels to be acceptable evidence that would easily hold up in court. These names include Hugo Grotius there father of international law, Simon Greenleaf( Royal Professor of Law and Dane Professor, He works are considered essential for what is and is not considered evidence. There is also J.N. D Anderson, Lord Caldicote, Sir Lionel Luckhood knighted twice by the queen and considered the most successful lawyer who ever lived. The list goes on. If you can obtain the book who rolled the stone away or what leading lawyers say about the resurrection. I predict like the titanic this one is going to sink as well. You heard it here first.

Answer 3

i'm no longer particular it truly is totally precise to assert that 'medical individuals' imagine something of the form. do no longer ignore that there is amazingly little secular evidence that this Jesus man or woman ever even existed contained in the first position. this substances an particularly sharp impediment on the variety of credible claims you are able to make. How do you coach that you've the continues to be of someone about whom we verifiably understand rather a lot no longer something? Likewise, inspite of the truth that those who're advancing the concept you cite have used some medical analyses, i imagine the final consensus of the medical community is they have overreached themselves. inspite of the truth that perhaps the statistical threat of having all those names jointly in a unmarried tomb may be small, i could in my opinion decide the threat that some believer built an honorary tomb to be severe (what number manger scenes have all of us seen in our lifetimes!). not one of the analyses so some distance could distinguish between and previous keepsake (or fraud) of that nature and the genuine issue. most of the different medical checks they have accomplished have similar issues. So i imagine the most it truly is lifelike to assert is that a tomb has been stumbled on which will have some connection. The variety of human beings that're scientists and could shelter this connection is amazingly rather low. Even truly some the professionals quoted as aspects disagree with the conclusions!

Answer 4

Don't confuse what scientists say with the hype. They found a tomb of a Jesus in Jerusalem. If Jesus died in Jerusalem, he would be buried there, since, by law, the body would have to be buried promptly. According to the Bible, Joseph of Arimathea paid for the tomb. The father of Anna Nicole Smith's baby would already be identified if the judge wasn't dragging his feet in order to the camera on himself. That has nothing to do with science.

Answer 5

Of course it's ridiculous. And don't even get started on the scientist thing - it was James Cameron, and he's NOT a scientist. I don't know what the hell he wanted besides ratings.

Any scientist (including me, an atheist) will tell you that there's no way for anyone to confirm that it was actually the body of Jesus. There's no DNA to test it against, no decendants known, and nothing else.

Answer 6

They do have a lot to prove. Please don't call them "scientific folk", it implies that every scientist out there is working on this. They're not. It's just a group of historians (whose credentials I know absolutely nothing about) who have an opinion that sells a lot of newspapers.

For all I know, this could very well be true. Or completely bogus. But I am not in the least offended by the suggestion. This is why religion should stay out of science.

Answer 7

alot of it is based on ancient text, idea and theory, idont think someone wrote ancient text on who Ana Niclole had sex with.


they havent literaly proven it YET, its all like a huge jigsaw puzzle and they've found enough evidence(most of the pieces of the puzzle) to put together an idea(see the picture) but they stilll havent finished the puzzle.

plus there will always be people who will try to claim the information is false even if they found all the pieces so this will take a long time to prove.

Answer 8

No I imagine Jesus came to life after being dead three days, and then he rose into the sky.

What's so hard to believe about that?

He rose into the sky with just the clothes he had on, and now he's the only guy in heaven with an earthly body and a set of earthly clothes.

You church people really crack me up. I think you all are a lot of fun.

Answer 9

You really should investigate things like this BEFORE you make such asinine comments. MOST of the scientific community does NOT think the bones found are of "the" Jesus.

Answer 10

I think they pretty much proved that they weren't Jesus' bones through DNA testing of some kind.