WE KNOW WHO PULLS THE STRINGS
Defenceless Pentagon? Anyone who believes that is nuts!!
They have full capability to shoot anything down out of that sector of air space at any time. Don't fool youself.
Norman Mineta’s testimony before the 911 Commission is damning and makes VP Cheney’s complicity pretty clear I think, unless inaction is a defence.
(PS. That plane was tracked from more than 50 miles out!)
Look at the bigger picture - Global Guardian, Vigilant Guardian, Vigilant Warrior, Amalgam Warrior, Crown Vigilance, Apollo Guardian , yes NORAD was busy that day.
Leaving the eastern seaboard open to “attack” from commercial airliners for more than an hour -
there’s no excuse for that!
Bush? Well, let's just say he spent extra time in Kindergarten that day.
Thor. Don’t blame Clinton, Raytheon had enjoyed a near monopoly in Western air-to-air missiles and he wanted to keep it that way. (Check Blair euro-missile/ Mar. 2000)
2007-03-11 13:25:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by JJ 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Commercial airliners don't use traditional radar. they are located using something similar to an IFF signal (identification friend or foe). The aircraft sends a signal to the tower giving its vitals (altitude, speed, etc). On 9/11, the terrorists turned off this signal, so nobody (NORAD or otherwise) could see them. If our fighters were sent in the wrong direction it wasn't some vast conspiracy. They were heading where the protocols said to go to intercept an incoming air attack. Which is why the interceptors flew out over the Atlantic. They were sent to intercept incoming aircraft believed to be coming in from that direction. Also, NORAD is a joint operation of the US and Canada since it covers Canadian airspace too. The US Vice President can't simply take charge. There are protocols to be observed. IF Cheney was sent to NORAD, it was because of one of these protocols. In the event of an attack, the president and vice president are sent to different locations to preserve continuity in the leadership.
2007-03-11 11:53:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well Brenda, Lisa, Nancy, Susy Q and God only knows how many more you use. He gave Cheney control because he couldn't find you. You say in your spamming that you support the troops. Then why is your protest of Bush at the Pentagon instead of the White House. I didn't know you were a link in the chain of command and knew first hand what the military was engaged in on 9-11
2007-03-11 09:04:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by ohbrother 7
·
4⤊
1⤋
Bush was in control of all defenses and Cheney stood throught he transfer to Airforce one control sector, This is protocol. All US land bases were stripped of air to air missles by former President Clinton. That included all Navy Airforce and Marine units. Air National guard units are issued them on a as per need bases. All issues were denied By Bill Clinton in 1997.
2007-03-11 08:57:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by THOR! 1
·
5⤊
0⤋
it truly is type of humorous. You supply Bush and Cheney all this credit for being so very wickedly smart in planning 9/11. yet, jointly, Cheney one way or the different forgot to hide his tracks even as he became at Norad. He had sufficient ability to reason mayhem and destruction, yet no longer sufficient to hide his again at Norad. even as that begins making experience to absolutely everyone no longer wearing a tin foil beret i'm particular we are going to all be up in hands. you recognize that became a planned exercising, easily everyone is conscious it. yet one way or the different, for individuals like your self, the different nonsense makes the grade. Bush? have you ever even stricken to observe the photographs of him sitting there after he became informed "Mr. President the country is lower than attack?" For that lengthy, very lengthy, seven minutes he sat searching like the proverbial deer contained in the headlights. That became no longer the expression of a guy who had stones the dimensions of King Kong's - it truly is what he'd favor to devise an attack like that on his own human beings. It became the face of a guy terrified and uncertain, stuck in his own black pit of worry. no longer the reaction i could have beloved from our President - yet easily no longer the reaction of a cold-hearted murderous traitor. the genuine global is a nasty position and all kinds of issues flow incorrect and individuals die. each and anytime something tragic occurs conspiracy theorists come out of their closets to entertain us. the project is that i visit't ever bear in mind one conspiracy theorist, even if it became over section fifty one, JFK, Marilyn Monroe, the moon landings, or Elvis, ever proving their conspiracy became genuine. i wager once you're paranoid, they are surely continuously when you.
2016-12-01 20:25:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
This sounds very suspicious to me. My understanding is that NORAD normally intercepts errant aircraft within minutes. Under normal operations, aircraft strikes would not have happened. Query "911 Truth"
Someone should have been fired, but the critical players were promoted ?!
2007-03-11 08:54:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by Skeptic 7
·
1⤊
5⤋
He didn't.
There are simply too many first-hand accounts of what happened on that day for anybody to believe something this dumb.
2007-03-11 10:10:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by MikeGolf 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Another conspiracy nut-job. Conspiracy theories are nothing more than liberals trying to shift focus from their known lack of interest in national security...
2007-03-11 08:54:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋