Do you think civilization and technologies have helped to preserve the environment...?

Question

...or on the contrary, do you think it has only brought nuisances, pollution..?

Answer 1

Ultimately, technology has allowed man to prosper beyond
what his environment will support. There wouldn't be
6 billion of us on the planet without, say, the wheel,
or fire.

Since the planet's current ecological crises wouldn't
be anywhere near as bad if there were, say, only a million
of us, I would say that technology has been, over all,
bad for the planet.

However, short of killing off every last man, woman and
child, I think technology will be a big part of saving the
planet as well. At least, I'm hoping...

Answer 2

we stumble on interior the historic previous training how the kings of those days have been unsleeping of the could nurture nature on a similar time as making use of it.. They harnessed rain water by skill of digging tanks for agriculture and farm animals use, for starting to be the floor water point and so on. that they had planted wood alongside the main significant roadways to arise with the money for shade to the visitors. They whether hunted the wild animals inflicting danger in villages adjoining to forests, as that they had the job to guard the persons from losses to their vegetation and farm animals.. yet some kings additionally hunted as a interest which won't be ideal to us, yet by skill of and massive, the ancients had an ecosystem awareness any way.. The technologies are in simple terms kit and it relies upon how we use them, whether interior the context of the ecosystem or in any different case.. There are techs to seize rain water extra effectively, to place across water extra economically (by skill of combating wastes by skill of evaporation and seapage enroute) like the drip and sprinkler methods.. we are able to get rid of the could fell wood for gas purpose by skill of adopting the commerce gas concepts.. and so on.. however the main significant explanation for the environmental damages are with the aid of over exploitation of nature for our increasing business, civic and different desires, without simultaneous action to fill up the losses and take measures to guard the materials.. There are techy for those too.. in basic terms we could continuously have the concepts... yet govts manned by skill of politicians on 5-365 days contract over potential to rule, provide away permission for each type of economic and different exploitation of hetero forward materials materials on a similar time as doing little for keeping the materials. As such it does no longer be prudent to ***** the techy in this remember. Our present day society of grasping and egocentric people interior the helm could maybe be blamed (maybe because of the fact people have the potential to vote for authentic palms, yet then the alternative is between evil and lesser evils in basic terms for the latter,,, what to do?!)..

Answer 3

i can't say whether it has preserved or polluted the environment.
but i can guarantee that it has made it possible for you to be able to ask a question on the internet.

Answer 4

I think the more industrialized we become, the more the earth suffers.

When she has suffered enough, we will all pay the price.