Is the Bush administration taking good care of wounded and maimed troops of the on-going wars??

Answer 1

of course not if it had been taking necessary actions it should have taken then u won't have heard people groaning and complaining.....................

Answer 2

He, and or his administration is'nt hiding something. If this grew to become into so which you does no longer have the stats and or info you're sighting. provide credit the place that's due and blame as properly to failed coverage for the final twenty to thirty years of dealing with such tyrant regiems interior the Med. Bush is status up and somewhat doing something approximately it for as quickly as. that's a shame that conflict is detrimental in lots of, many techniques. those are the fees that would desire to be payed for peace interior the destiny. in case you dont consider those regulations then attempt voting it is your stunning. And if this would not contend properly with then you definitely seem at different strategies. no person will blame you for going to the middle east to ease suffering of those immediately affected. purely like no person will carry you back in case you think of the answer is to pass over there and help the insurgencies doctrine. do exactly what's physically powerful on your heart and recommendations and bare the end results of your very own movements.

Answer 3

The VA hospital that I go to deliverers excellent care. Walter Reed was selected for closure during the Clinton administration or early in the Bush years. Once a post is on the death list is is on the bottom of the list for getting new equipment or personnel. They are certainly not going to do any new construction or much upkeep. I have heard a lot of stories about bad care of wounded troops but I have yet to hear much direct testimony from the troops themselves. I wonder how much of this is election rhetoric.

Answer 4

This is a loaded question- the questioner knows the answer and is simply trying to get others on his/her bandwagon. This is not the point of yahoo answers- make the statements on your blog.

Politicians, in general, don't even know how to take good care of themselves. They have surrendered their well-being in exchange for power. So, if they can't take care of themselves, of course they won't take care of others.

Bush isn't a unique politician, he is a typical puppet. But before the world jumps on him, I recommend that everyone looks at their own corrupt, inhumane governments, and realize that there is no reason to think that the problem solely exists in Washington DC.

Answer 5

Wounded one is not Bush administration's member

Answer 6

Spend a day at the Brooks Army Medical Ceneter is San Antonio or at Walter Reed and you will be embaressed by how our government takes care of those who are injured and their families.
any asumption you might have about how they are treated are wrong. i could go on and on, but it is just words. those who are picking up the peices of their shattered lives are dealing with it on a daily basis. in a war where billions are wasted daily, the army loves to nickel and dime injured soldiers.

Answer 7

Understand that the lack of quality care is a characteristic of socialized medicine. The government can't handle this sort of thing with its bureaucratic red-tape. Be very afraid of politicians advocating socialized medicine or you too might end up in a cockroach and rodent infested hospital ward.

Answer 8

the Bush administration doing anything right...hah!! Thats a crock. George Bush and the rest of his goons are the most incompetent set of government officials to ever lead a country. EVER!

Answer 9

Heck no. I worked in the VA. Its a horrible place. It was bad when CLinton was there too, but Bush just compounded the problem.

Answer 10

no not at all