I expected 16-18 mpg's. I know it is a jeep and you don't buy one for the fuel mileage, but 13-14 mpg on the highway is ridiculous!! My 1997 Ford Explorer with V8 All-Wheel Drive gets 14-16 mpg, and the 1998 Jeep Cherokee was getting 17-18mpg when It was wrecked. The dealer says they checked everything, but are not able to give me an answer other than that is normal. I have read a number of posts here and elsewhere and haven't found any with similar fuel mileage. I am wondering what can be checked, or did I just get a lemon?
2007-03-10
13:04:13
·
10 answers
·
asked by
aquila3330
1
in
Cars & Transportation
➔ Car Makes
➔ Jeep
I have always had SUVs, although they were never as new as this one. None of them had this poor of fuel mileage, so is the quality of newer vehicles declining as is the case in other types of products? It has about 4000 miles on it, has Amsoil synthetic oil, dealer has run EEC test with no fault codes. I have driven my 97 explorer and 2006 Liberty on alternating days and checked fuel mileage and the explorer consistently gets 1-2 mpg better. It is older, heavier, V8 vs V6, 131000 miles vs. 4000, it just doesn't make sense to me?!?
2007-03-10
13:29:05 ·
update #1
The overinflated EPA estimate is 17/22. I am getting 13-14 on the interstate, which is 8-9 mpg less or nearly 50 % less. I have read the EPA is revising its testing and that the hybrids will take the biggest hit and lose 30-40%, my liberty is lower than that. I understand how the EPA estimates are inaccurate and that driving conditions affect mpg, but my concern is the comparisons of my newest vehicle I have ever owned and the older ones that have/are getting better fuel mileage. Also, I understand that there may not be an answer other than I got a lemon.
2007-03-10
13:34:41 ·
update #2