Yes. Many people who were at the test died of radiation poisoning.
2007-03-10 13:03:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by redd headd 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
regardless of the truth that the mushroom cloud has come to characterize the atomic bomb, any very severe order detonation at or close to Earth's floor will produce one. it isn't completely the end results of the nuclear mind-set to generating potential. we are able to produce small mushroom clouds with effortless chemical explosives. The mushroom cloud consequences even as the air is without delay displaced in all guidelines, then rushes again in in route of the middle because it "rebounds". even as it meets contained in the middle again, it has nowhere to flow yet up, because the Earth's floor restrains it. it truly is in consumer-friendly words a fluid dynamic result. And sure, the computer fashions can predict very appropriately the quantity of potential which will be produced in a collision with an asteroid, comet, or meteor of a few particular mass. And lets properly be truly particular that if such potential were produced abruptly in a collision, a mushroom cloud will be how the ambience responds.
2016-12-01 19:40:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes but by now in a really small way, think with radioactive materials is they all degrade (thats what makes them radioactive) so by now all that crap that flew out of the bomb is either dead or emitting really really small amounts of radiation.. everyone seems to be so scared to radiation after that russian guy was assasinated by it takes huge does to hard you, HUGE. we get bombarded by bits of radiation all the time which damage our cells, its no big deal, dont worry about it.. if your hair starts falling out and u constantly puke blood, maybe worry then.. oh yea and television sets do not give out radiation, neather do micrwave ovens.. people worry waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too much.. LOL what the **** is tarot on about, since when did nukes cause acid rain??? , if i remeber correctly its normally sulphur from pollution, hence sulphuric acid (v v v v v v v v v v vv diluted, prolly with a ph of about 6.9) but since when is sulphur a part of a nuclear weapon? doesnt it cause enough damage without making their statues look a bit crappy after 80 years or so
2007-03-10 13:15:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
they used to put out seats for a front row view, many of those people have come down with cancer. The more cynical or conspiracy minded think that they were used as guiniea pigs. could be, but they didnt really understand a whole lot about what they were doing back then.
2007-03-10 13:03:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by tomhale138 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Consider that certain cancers were 10 and 20 times the national average in towns near the test sites and you have your answer.
2007-03-10 13:02:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes there was lots of pollution, and yes they know what each species can tolerate in terms of radiation poisoning. Turns out that rats and cockroaches are very resistant to radiation, go figure huh?
2007-03-10 13:03:44
·
answer #6
·
answered by ron k 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah, it eventually killed John Wayne, he filmed in the location of the the first bomb test area!
2007-03-10 13:04:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by tattie_herbert 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
No it was a Trader Joe's brand "Green" A-Bomb that was dropped on Hiroshima. It was made from 100% recycled material and is completely biodegradable.
2007-03-10 13:02:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
volcanoes emit sulfur that warms the planet,an atomic bomb dose just that,it can create asid rain
2007-03-10 13:06:48
·
answer #9
·
answered by tarrot2003 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Of course, we all have some radioactive traces in our teeth and bones which can be measured, but it is very low, and we have natural traces of radioactivity which are much greater.
2007-03-10 14:26:42
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋