Rational
-adj.
1. Having or exercising the ability to reason.
2. Of sound mind; sane.
3. Consistent with or based on reason; logical.
Are God's actions and commands based on reason and logic, or are they based on emotions and instincts?
If God's commands are based on reason and logic, why are reason and logic so rarely used to convince humanity to follow them? Why do religions instead demand that we follow God's commands simply because God and/or ancient texts say so?
Wouldn't explaining the reason and logic of God's commands to "nonbelievers" be a better way to convince them to follow them?
Or do God's actions and commands lack reason and logic and therefore they must be followed simply because he says so?
2007-03-10
12:05:02
·
8 answers
·
asked by
scifiguy
6
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
It may have taken Einstein to develp the theory of relativity, but many of us lesser mortals can at least understand parts of it.
If God's commands are rational, then surely at least a limited understanding of them is possilbe for us lowly humans. Wouldn't even that limited understanding of them be useful and help encourage humanity to follow them?
2007-03-10
12:17:00 ·
update #1
Sarah, I posed this question because it seems to me that nearly all answers from Christians, Muslims, and other monotheists in this forum demand that God's commands be followed simply because he says so.
The potential logic and reason behind them is rarely, if ever, mentioned here.
Because of that, these commands are generally dismissed by all other faiths out of hand simply because they do not believe in the same God.
This lack of discussion of the rationale behind the commands builds a wall that is rarely breached between the different faiths on this site.
I wish that would change, but I doubt it ever will.
2007-03-10
12:34:56 ·
update #2