Especially in the religion category. To disagree with someone doesn't mean that they are dumb, worthless ground-dirt and you ae the high, grand pooh-bah of intellegence.
2007-03-10 11:44:37 · 31 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
In both the questions and the answers.
2007-03-10 11:57:38 · update #1
i agree. i think it's just human nature. we have christians bashing the atheist. we have atheist bashing christians,and we have some that just want to bash everybody. name calling is kinda childish.i have a 7 year old that i have correct on a daily basis for this same thing. take bigirv@s for an example.
2007-03-10 11:51:44 · answer #1 · answered by jomi 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
To disagree with someone doesn't mean that they are dumb, worthless ground-dirt and you ae the high, grand pooh-bah of intellegence.
but it does help!
2007-03-10 20:00:48 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know, especially when people post a question that is just posted to cause intimidation and when people answer questions when they do not have a clue what they are talking about, they just want to throw their two-pennies worth in.
I am a Christian, but have seen in in Christians and how they come across and non-bleievers aswell.
Surely we are ALL mature enough to get over this.
btw, I am 16
2007-03-10 19:54:33 · answer #3 · answered by Cookie_Monster_UK 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Haven't really figured that one out yet.
There are similarites with the Politics section.
People have to continually convince THEMSELVES that they're on the "one right path" to salvation, I dunno.
It's like, their philosophy or theology is the "only" correct one and everyone else is misguided scum.
One of life's mysteries...
2007-03-10 20:40:14 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Everyone has different ideas and stating self opinion only. this is not considered an insult but an intent to help others with their questions.
2007-03-10 19:49:51 · answer #5 · answered by JoJoBa 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who ever said we have to. Plus look at how some of the questions are written. They're insults turned into questions.
2007-03-10 19:48:21 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
to justify our beliefs,
to ease our false sense of security,
to manifest our need for controlling others.
Notice how we never see people pointing out their own mistakes, only that of others.
Perhaps we can start being a bit humble. I will start. Today I slipped on my diet and had lustful thoughts during synagogue. I repent, and am not perfect. I am often not right.
So there!
Blessings
David
2007-03-10 19:48:59 · answer #7 · answered by David T 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Perhaps it is because they are anonymous and can say things they would never say to someones face. Generally because they would not be very strong in a real debate.
2007-03-10 19:53:22 · answer #8 · answered by Enchanted Gypsy 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I agree. It's all just a big misunderstanding including poor communication. And they wonder why they call Satin "the author of confusion". This is what he wants. Think about it.
2007-03-10 19:51:33 · answer #9 · answered by hardworkur84 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I agree.
Those who insult here, and in life, are usually insecure people who lack conviction in their beliefs.
Otherwise they could explain their position without degrading another. They could agree to disagree.
=================================
2007-03-10 19:50:27 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋