That the Shinto Kami (Gods) are Japanese Mythology, But when you search for Jesus they call him a Historical figure???
Isnt this wrong? Have any of your Gods been called Mythilogical while Jesus is called Historical?
2007-03-10 10:52:29 · 15 answers · asked by Bobby 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Yes, and people are always calling my Gods 'false gods' or demons too. It's just a way of demoralizing you and demonizing your faith. All religions are based on mythology, but most people tend to think anything that is a myth is a lie, (which isn't the case). They think by calling their gawd historical that it makes him more legitimate.
Jesus is in no way historical, he is pure unadulterated mythology based largely on Mythras. He isn't even original!
2007-03-10 11:06:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Jesus is listed as an historical figure because their is some empirical evidence outside of the Bible as to his existence. The person of Jesus (regardless if you consider him to be god in flesh) is different from a mythological god. In more contemporary terms, Jesus was more like david koresh with better publicity....
2007-03-10 19:06:19 · answer #2 · answered by skippyq67 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
there is some archaeological and historical evidence to suggest there really was a perosn called Jesus... So that could explain the historical figure notion (even I as an agnostic am willing to accept that), but you have to take into account that most encyclopediae in the western world are written by christian authors/puplishers... so tend to be somewhat biased in thier portrayal.
2007-03-10 19:00:24 · answer #3 · answered by supernicebloke2000 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Myth is something with little or no documented evidence. Jesus, on the other hand, whether or not you believe He is God, is the most documented person to have ever walked this earth. There is more documentation on Jesus that any other subject ever written about.
2007-03-10 19:00:40 · answer #4 · answered by Desperado 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Jesus did exist and this is an excepted fact in almost every culture. Only his divinity is in question.
He is a historical figure.
2007-03-10 18:58:06 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Western encyclopedias are written with a heavy christian influence.
2007-03-10 19:10:01 · answer #6 · answered by XX 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Jesus is listed in secular history books.
2007-03-10 19:01:53 · answer #7 · answered by RB 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
because Jesus actually existed, and mithilogical "gods" didnt.
whether or not you believe He is the Son of God, His existence can be proved. whereas the "sun god" or the wind gods" existence cant be proven.
2007-03-10 19:13:16 · answer #8 · answered by love-life 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yep, mine have all been classified that way.
Jesus is in no way historical.. there's not one shred of historical evidence for his existence.
2007-03-10 18:58:03 · answer #9 · answered by Kallan 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
The world's views things are wrong and God will judge them
2007-03-10 18:56:14 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋