Will the democrats take the credit if they can turn the war in Iraq into another Veitnam?

Answer 1

No, they never brag when they get millions of people killed, like they caused in Nam & Cambodia.
They know they caused it, but that's one thing Democrats never bragged about.
But they will extend "the hand of friendship" to all our enemies.
Well..... they are already doing that.

Answer 2

We didn't lose major battles in either wars. Technically we won the Iraq war in the first two months. then it became something else. In May of 2003 President Bush from the aircraft carrier Abraham Lincoln announced we had one the war all major comabte had ceased

Both were or became civil or tribal wars.
The fighting between the sunni's, shiites , kurds has been going on for hundreds of years.

As for Vietnam and Iraq your clueless. Try doing some background
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/

Our war was and still should be in Afghanistan where the
Taliban is flourishing, the warlords are back in control and the poppy crops are at all time highs.

Answer 3

No, they can't take credit because it was another Viet Nam before the midterm election. Getting into a guerilla war in VN was a lose-lose situation. Door to door 'fighting' in Iraq is not any different as to casualties and strategy.

Answer 4

This is not vietnam, it's worse. This is the U.S. oil trust aginst the Arab oil trust. There is not much difference in George Bush and Bin Laden or Saddam (from an outside perspective). Other than the oil interest there is religious significance (no land is holy religious indoctrination is just being used for socio-economic manipulation). We need to leave Iraq and bush needs to stop tring to americanize everything because he is just pissing people off. Never elect an oil man president. It doesnt matter who is in the white house. This is the economically elete having it out .

Answer 5

properly they were given us into global conflict 2 through lack of worrying and our perfect familiar grew to develop into Repulican and grew to develop into president. They staged an attack on the U.S. Maddox to justify sending troops into Vietnam and then even as they could of gained the conflict they enable the liberal press convince them to stop the bombing because we were killing too many non warring parties. It grew to develop into this kind of farst that LBJ determined now to not run for a 2d time period as president. yet his structure organization nonetheless had each and each of the rights to construct our bases over there. And as for the conflict in Iraq I in no way agreed with invading them contained in the first position. truly some Democrates voted for it inspite of the truth that now they don't favor to percentage the blame.And for 9/11/01, it may in no way of got here about if Clinton could have had encumbered taken out even as he became in place of work we knew suitable the position he became at, and we knew he became the genuine of the terrorists who had blew up 2 of our embassies, yet we did no longer something. i do not understand why we do not pass Pakistan all of us understand thats the position he's and get him i wager both activities have their faults. yet in reality one has any morals and all of us understand which one it truly is the conservative one.

Answer 6

If you can call it 'credit', yes. Liberals seem to delight in American failure. I heard about a most telling remark when Clinton was first elected President. A Democrat scowled at the sight of US fighter jets flying overhead in celebration, until his companion reminded him, 'oh, yeah, those are ours, now'.

Nice attitude.

Answer 7

You mean like Al Gore's "I invented the Internet"?

Answer 8

It's the Republicans who are doing so. Not admitting that the war effort was wrong and we are not winning. That seems to be the message Bush is sending.

Answer 9

no they won´t! they made the viet nam war n´later, they said it
was the unique war the REPUBLICANS had lost.

Answer 10

Hard to take credit for the c*ckup of the Bush administration.