Do you consider a female at age 22 and hight 5ft4
weighting 134 fat?
2007-03-10 08:21:53 · 22 answers · asked by Jamie T 4 in Health ➔ Diet & Fitness
Not even close, dear.
2007-03-10 08:25:13 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
134 pounds at 22 is not fat
2007-03-10 08:58:27 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If u have a fat complex at 5'4 134 lbs u need to talk to a psych cause u are trippin. Do u know how many women who would die to be where u are( including me). Dont fall victim to the sterotypes in the media-stickthin is not beautiful.
2007-03-10 08:31:32 · answer #3 · answered by boolissa2002 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Even if you don't have curves. You are not fat whatsoever. Try being 16 5'5" and 342 lbs. That's what I am. So hunny, don't worry about being 134. Especially at 5'4"
2007-03-10 08:27:26 · answer #4 · answered by Whispers 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You're not "fat". If you were 3 ft tall and 134 then maybe..
2007-03-10 08:33:49 · answer #5 · answered by ltlbox 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am 5'2" at 140 and have been told to put a little more weight on my butt. Excuse me. My husband likes what I have so why worry
You sound good to me. Just don't lose any of it and eat right and exercise whenever you can
Good luck
2007-03-10 08:33:20 · answer #6 · answered by Angell 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I , personally don't think that 134 is heavy but who cares what I think ,you shouldn't ! As long as your comfortable with yourself no matter what you weigh ...no worries slim ! ;)
2007-03-10 08:33:00 · answer #7 · answered by tammie1ca 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. That's about how much I weigh, and I'm slightly taller (5ft7), but I also have basically no biceps, pects, or abs. I know girls who weigh more than me that are extremely attractive, because they're not fat, generally they're muscular.
2007-03-10 08:28:36 · answer #8 · answered by ILookGuilty 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am 5ft.2 and weigh more than that and wear a size four jeans. No way is that fat!
2007-03-10 08:26:07 · answer #9 · answered by sibelover 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no i dont ...i really dont consider you fat....cause you are 22 and 134....no fat....that is small..that what i consider that is...trust me it is not fat...
2007-03-10 08:27:12 · answer #10 · answered by dashawn d 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO sounds beautiful
could you consider a 66m?
2007-03-10 08:26:54 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋