English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2 answers

Around 1980, there was an electronics retailer in the New York City area called Crazy Eddie. The chain's claim to fame was that it would beat the price of any other store, a claim that I verified in 1985 with my purchase of a CD player. That is the earliest that I recall seeing an electronics store claim that it would beat any price.

2007-03-12 15:34:07 · answer #1 · answered by pvreditor 7 · 4 0

No, the youngster protection Act would not bypass that a techniques: who's a toddler a toddler is a individual below 18 years. 21A Unborn babies (a million) This section applies if, until now the start of a youngster, the administrative govt particularly suspects the youngster could be in want of protection AFTER she or he's born. (2) the administrative govt would desire to take the action the administrative govt considers appropriate consisting of, as an occasion— (a) having an accepted officer inspect the circumstances and inspect the probability that the youngster will want protection AFTER she or he's born; or (b) offering help and help to the pregnant female. (3) the purpose of this section is to decrease the probability that the youngster will want protection AFTER she or he's born (as unfavorable to interfering with the pregnant female’s rights or liberties). The Act would not supply for interference with a pregnant female, keep "offering help and help". it particularly is it. Is a slippery slope: would a pregnant females drink a pitcher of champagne on New Years Eve? forget approximately approximately it, the regulation has no corporation interfering - and the regulation needless to say recognises it and cuts in need of such interference.

2016-12-18 10:12:58 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers