English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

alot of prople ask questions reagarding evolution can you argue that we are all not a process of evolution? I mean we start out as an unfurtilized ovum till out daddy's come along with their sperm and conception occures, we then evolve into an enbryo, we are like this for around 7 weeks till we then evolve once again into a fetus and for the last and final time after 40 weeks we evolve into a baby/human and are born this has been well and truly prooven so can you still argue that this/we are not the product of evolution or is not true?

2007-03-10 06:35:23 · 2 answers · asked by Kenny K 4 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

2 answers

development is a different kind of evolution. It is not something from nothing. It is evolution in the definition of the word, but not really the science kind of meaning. Going by that logic, a blanket that someone scraps and turns into, say, curtains evolved, too. So yes, the blanket evolved, but not on its own. Same with people and development. We evolve, but with God's help.


I don't really care about the whole evolution thing, and really, that kind of sounds stupid to me, too;I was just trying to think of an argument of what someone might say to answer your question. :)

2007-03-10 07:43:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

What is there to argue about. You have just confirmed Pasteur's great Law. There is no such thing as spontaneous generation. Christians have no problem saying that "Life did Not come from non-life."

Bryan

2007-03-10 20:12:06 · answer #2 · answered by free2bme55 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers