would 2 12" JL Audio's sound better then 2 12" Alpine Type R's with 2 6.5" Polk component speakers??
2007-03-10 06:30:54 · 7 answers · asked by Nick S 1 in Cars & Transportation ➔ Car Audio
the JL Audio's are w6v2's
2007-03-10 07:40:16 · update #1
the alpines are 12" type R's
2007-03-10 12:00:57 · update #2
both are overated, and JL is hella overpriced. do yourself a favor, and before you buy either listen to a Boston Acousitcs G5. there $400 retail, but you can get them on ebay for about $200. just listen to one if you can find it, and i can almost promise you it'll be the sub you end up with.
2007-03-12 04:53:22 · answer #1 · answered by JimL 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
bang for your buck the alpines are a good choice but if money dosnt concern you go with the w6s 2 w6 10s will sound better then the 12 rs jl is cleaner and picks up cleaner low freaquency waves also jl is just top notch bragging rights.
2007-03-10 17:25:52 · answer #2 · answered by bryce c 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have heard both subs. Both are really nice sounding subs but out of my opinion JL subs sound better. They are a bit tighter and cleaner and hit harder than alpines. But its a pretty close match. This is based off the JL W3. The w3 was a bit louder than the alpine too.
2007-03-10 15:08:33 · answer #3 · answered by Woody 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
JL is the best in sounds. Apline is only good with like tv units.
2007-03-11 17:32:26 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
ive heard alot about jl and ive heard type rs and i liek the type r's. so id say either way ur getting a good deal.
2007-03-12 10:38:47 · answer #5 · answered by harley 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
type rs are very loud and make alot of noise, but jls hit real tight and clean
2007-03-10 18:55:15 · answer #6 · answered by Mystery 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
if it was up to me i would use the JLs but thats my opinion
2007-03-10 17:57:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋