and why is the pope not allowed to have children, if the father does ?
2007-03-10 05:45:36 · 16 answers · asked by 0000001 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Anomaly ?
if god created jesus, then where does the virgin come in ?
2007-03-10 05:53:18 · update #1
and if jesus die for us, woudnt be better if he lived on and spread christianity and perform miracles ?
2007-03-10 05:56:33 · update #2
i really think you christians have a lot to know
about your own religion, i'll stick with the "one god" idea for now.
2007-03-10 05:59:52 · update #3
1 ~ he was never married
2 ~ thats not what he was here for
2007-03-10 05:48:18 · answer #1 · answered by Thelaka 2 · 6⤊ 1⤋
Good question! One with no answer! Here are some more!
If we're all the children of God, what makes Jesus special?
Isn't Jesus dieing for my sins like someone going to jail for me?
Why did Jesus say that all non-Isrealites were dogs in the old testament?
If Jesus died, was resurrected, died again, and rose again, can he keep dieing for more stuff?
Why do we call it the afterlife? Shouldn't it be called the eternal life?
What if the poor people Jesus was helping were evil? Since when does poor mean righteous?
OMG HOW I COULD GO ON.
2007-03-10 05:52:50 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because Jesus' life work on Earth was to serve God. Nothing on Earth really matters anyway. What does matter is the works that we do for God. I think the Pope, even though I am not Catholic, is to be a servant unto the Lord and to man. He is not to be distracted by family and children.
2007-03-10 05:52:50 · answer #3 · answered by t2ensie 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
In my personal belief, Jesus was the only man that walked the earth---the Son of Man---that did not commit sin, whether in thought or actions. Since the blood line was impure, due to the fallen angels that were jealous of human flesh and raped and malested it, this was necessary and to keep the universal laws of nature in balance. That is why He was born of emaculate conception. Jesus was also aware of his destiny to be crucified, so why would He want to pro-create. His teachings also emphasize to take care of His children---meaning ALL OF US & especially the orphans and you will be blessed. As far as the Pope, to make an analogy, it would impure the body and soul to have sexual relations and make it more difficult to acquire atonement with the Heavenly Father.
2007-03-10 06:00:45 · answer #4 · answered by unknownsoldier1st 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
properly you're on to something there once you requested about Jesus being the precise photo of the daddy! i have self belief that you're incorrect once you're saying that Jesus became a lesser god than the daddy. the reality is that Jesus is thoroughly equivalent with the daddy. The Bible says that the fullness of God dwelled in Jesus, that means that the completed being of God became in Jesus. The Bible also says that Jesus has authority over the completed earth--authority which could in reality belong to God! so some distance as death is going, Jesus became concern to death because he gave up his existence because of his own loose will. He chosen to die because he became the acceptable and extremely last sacrifice that became made for sin. because he became a guy, he could die on the flow. because he became God, he could undergo the punishment of the wrath hostile to sin being poured out on him. in reality God could undergo the completed wrath of God. you won't be able to really say that God can die, because he's immortal. It says that once Jesus became on the flow, he gave up his spirit. The flesh and blood of Jesus died, yet his spirit lived on, resembling easily everyone else that dies. Jesus now has an eternal, glorified body which will in no way die, so now even his flesh and blood are eternal. This became given to him after his resurrection.
2016-12-01 19:13:59 · answer #5 · answered by dymke 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In Heaven we will all be brothers in Christ under the Fatherhood of God. We will none of us have children anymore, even our earthly parents and earthly children will become our brothers in Christ.( only if they are saved).
All the naive calling unsaved humans - holy fathers - they will also be just our brothers if they repent and are accepted into heaven(only if they are saved). The traditions which make faulty humans able to save other unredeemed humans negate the Sacrifice of Christ ( result-antiChrist).
And if the Salvation of the infallible pope is uncertain, how can he forgive sinners and send them to heaven. Don't you see the trick satan played in the formation of the Catholic Church.
Also an unrepentent homosexual priest who himself will not inherit the Kingdom of God (the Bible) - can he sprinkle some water on a baby who cannot repent yet - and send him to heaven.
LIES of Satan was swallowed by unsaved humans who created traditions for salvation instead of true faith for their Salvation.
Most of my infant baptised Christian friends do not need to read the bible because they have been tricked into false assurance by the Catholic church- which destroys need for personal repentance.
John the Baptist could have not said "Repent and be baptised" if any guy can be saved by some water sprinkled on their head.
Even Jesus who held a young person blessed the child - He did not baptze the baby. But innocent babies who die early will be saved by God's ,grace, mercy and righteousness only.
Accountable adults must repent and be baptized.
2007-03-10 06:07:23 · answer #6 · answered by Charles H 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Jesus is the son, but he is also the father and the holy ghost. So in essence he gave birth to himself? Anyway. Maybe it's because I'm not Catholic but I don't see what this has to do with the Pope.
2007-03-10 05:50:31 · answer #7 · answered by Julia Sugarbaker 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
not that I believe any of it, but God supposedly said 'poof-here mary you're righteous enough to be pregnant with my son by magic' (too bad if you weren't ready for this mary, I'm God, deal with it and feel privileged) anyway, if Mary was a virgin than God is too, huh? p.s......the pope wouldn't be able to handle children, he's too busy. Besides he (and priests) lack that little magic wand so they have to be virgins and keep practicing impregnating women through their minds....you know like God did.
2007-03-10 05:56:53 · answer #8 · answered by Virgo 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
God didn't "have" Jesus, he created him. Jesus came to earth to die for us. Having children and then dying and going back to heaven would have left his child fatherless on earth. Raising a family was not Jesus' focus, purpose, or mission and is a serious matter to God. One should not have children if one cannot support them and raise them properly.
2007-03-10 05:50:14 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
1- he might have, if he did why would his kids admit it? they'd be killed or mistreated
2- popes and other clergy can't ahve children because in the 1500s the church got sick of paying for all their children
3- some religious people have hang-ups about sex
2007-03-10 06:07:26 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
.Well that is question of the day.
I Just believe he was a typical Jew of the day and Mary M. was his squeeze.. other wise he would be queer in the public eye.
That rude Pope comment OHH ,!! sad, !! they only do boys.
And just like Bill - - that's not sex. administering an enema
2007-03-10 05:59:25 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋