English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Gals have perfected the chore of doling out rejection to an art form and is praised as virtuous and pure each time they reject a guy for their own doggone reasons. I know gals rejecting guys for petty causes and could not find any virtue in their clinical maneuveres even if my life depended on it. Guys on the other hand are soon labebled gay if their standards or expectations are off the norm and they travel many a mile before finding the right one. Specially so if the guy keeps rejecting advances from other gals, provided he is desirable dating material with proper hygiene and acceptable manners. Is there a double standard here and guys are being compelled to dilly dally with dalliances that the gals might have ***** nally rejected. This roly poly nature of romance is both unfair and confusing. Should the guy not be equally praised for running away from a gal early on in the game, whatever the reason maybe? Why do gals have to label the guy gay if they fail to score with him? Any Idea

2007-03-10 05:41:42 · 3 answers · asked by Kaliyug Ka Plato 3 in Family & Relationships Singles & Dating

3 answers

Losers have a habit of labelling. Remamber the 'sour grapes' story. Secondly, few guys too label such gals who ignore their advances. And finally, girls know very well how to balance those aapproaches while guys don't. If a guy could avoid those approaches in a better manner, probably he would be admired (I've seen these things happen).

All the best...

:-)

2007-03-10 17:35:21 · answer #1 · answered by plato's ghost 5 · 0 0

It's so true! This happened to me twice at work with two girls I work with. This one Mexican lady, who is a dishwasher, keeps telling me she's going to leave her husband (through whom she got citizenship) and she keeps emailing me and crying on my shoulder and asking me to meet her for coffee. But because I just ignore her advances, she's always asking me, "You no are gay?", "You no are bisexual?", because how could a single guy in his early twenties ever possibly resist an obese 37-year old woman, whose been married twice, with a daughter in tow, who can no longer have children because she just had a hystercomy? I have to be gay, right? And then the other girl is my age, and she saw me sitting and talking with my friend, and because he wouldn't stop smiling, she said we must be "more than friends". I explained to her, "No, he has Asperger's Syndrome and so he smiles like that all the time". But of course I must be lying because I don't find her attractive.

2007-03-10 23:03:03 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Girls are more choosy because they dont want be called "slutty". But if youre a guy who's not in a relationship, and the girl is pretty, then whats the reason to turn her down? Thats why you could be labelled gay.

2007-03-11 01:32:20 · answer #3 · answered by man_on_the_moon 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers