Gals have perfected the chore of doling out rejection to an art form and is praised as virtuous and pure each time they reject a guy for their own doggone reasons. I know gals rejecting guys for petty causes and could not find any virtue in their clinical maneuveres even if my life depended on it. Guys on the other hand are soon labebled gay if their standards or expectations are off the norm and they travel many a mile before finding the right one. Specially so if the guy keeps rejecting advances from other gals, provided he is desirable dating material with proper hygiene and acceptable manners. Is there a double standard here and guys are being compelled to dilly dally with dalliances that the gals might have ***** nally rejected. This roly poly nature of romance is both unfair and confusing. Should the guy not be equally praised for running away from a gal early on in the game, whatever the reason maybe? Why do gals have to label the guy gay if they fail to score with him? Any Idea
2007-03-10
05:41:42
·
3 answers
·
asked by
Kaliyug Ka Plato
3
in
Family & Relationships
➔ Singles & Dating