English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

36 answers

Holy Orders are "Holy".

Women are banned, so are the disabled. Yes, there should be higher standards for a Priest. It is wrong by Catholic Doctrine to discriminate against homosexuals. However, this doesn't give them the keys to Priesthood either.

I remember JPII's funeral where a man without arms spoke about his desire to be a Priest and was denied specifically because he didn't have arms. He became a musician (played with feet) and this brough him audience in front of JPII (we love u) and to jails, and churches. When he reflected back, although God closed the door he opened a window; and this man got to do everthing he wanted as a Priest, but instead he did it as a muscian.

2007-03-10 02:26:46 · answer #1 · answered by Giggly Giraffe 7 · 0 2

I personally believe that anyone who is gay should not be allowed to be a priest. That is a position of leadership within the church to point others to Christ. What sort of an example is it to allow someone who is gay to hold such authority within the church? The Bible does not condone homosexuality any more so than it condones any other sin, possession for example. I feel that all religions should ban gays from priesthood or the position of church pastor. As for the molestation issues, that sort of sickness and deviate behavior is also found in those who claim to be straight. I don't think being gay is the problem there. A sick person is a sick person, gay or straight. Being gay is not a prerequisite.

2007-03-10 02:35:37 · answer #2 · answered by froggsfriend 5 · 0 1

Even Jesus had his Judas. The percentage of molesters is the same across the board in all walks of life. In The Catholic Church it is less than 4% of the priesthood. That's not much (too much but, statistically not). The person that talked of the Seminaries had a good answer but, it is all connected to the Bishops in these diocese where the majority of this happened. I like to call it a Staff Infection.

2007-03-10 03:38:10 · answer #3 · answered by Midge 7 · 1 0

I believe that even if they ban'em it is still difficult to find out for shure catholic, non catholic churches I really feel its a matter of being a good human being in all aspects of life and definitely being honest and play a real priesting role among communities, this comment not trying to say there are not good priests sons of the lord up there.

2007-03-10 02:34:55 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Gays do not molest children and gay priests do not molest children. Child molesters molest children. Since religious fanatics lump anything they do not like into one category it is understandable that you have no idea what you are talking about. Molesting children is something on its own. Most molesters are in fact married or have long term relationships with women, until they get caught and then most women don't want to have much to do with them anymore. And it is like being an alcoholic - if you are an alcoholic you will be until they day you die. You may not ever drink again, but you are an alcoholic. A child molester is a child molester until the day they die. With discipline they may never molest, but they are until they die.

2007-03-10 02:32:44 · answer #5 · answered by bocasbeachbum 6 · 3 0

not sure if it was gay priests who molested the kids, however one thing I know they should ban gays from the priesthood anyway, because the Bible says, homosexuality is an abomination to God. I know that this is going to be called hatred- but before you do, hear me out- the Bible also says that sex between 2 people who are not married is sin too- so I do not hate gays- I am just saying what the word of God says.

2007-03-10 02:47:53 · answer #6 · answered by AdoreHim 7 · 0 2

And what good would that do? It's not as if the priests who molested kids told anyone in the seminary that they were gay. And being gay doesn't make you a child molester

2007-03-10 02:42:57 · answer #7 · answered by OhKatie! 6 · 2 0

i'm no longer a Catholic anymore, darling, yet i do no longer think of that being gay right away makes a individual much less worth of doing any activity. I actual do no longer think of it makes human beings right away incapable of ending up non secular responsibilities. i understand some gay clergymen, inclusive of the brother of my ex-step-mom. He left the priesthood and finally settled down with a great youthful guy. individually, i think of that is style of merciless to call for that gay adult males be celibate and positioned non secular ideals above their very own happiness, and then refuse to permit them to take a activity that calls for that they do in basic terms that. (((Kuma))) @Skye, your lack of understanding is exhibiting. because of the fact a male pedophile molests male babies does not make that pedophile gay...the familiar public of male pedophiles who molest boys are heterosexual of their grownup sexual relationships. gay adult males are actually not right away pedophiles. And jointly as the media has centred on the boys who've been assaulted, many, many females have been assaulted, too. lots on your ignorant assertion that each and every physique the scandals have been adult males assaulting boys. And thank you to pay interest on the female victims of this. As somebody else reported, detrimental Catholic ladies...hosed back.

2016-09-30 11:45:57 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

You don't have to be gay to molest kids. Priests are not supposed to have sex and I think that they get frustrated and need to have sex but they can't do it openly. so they prey on little kids, innocent kids who will more than likely not say anything. i mean come on, little kids are trusting and naive and want to believe what older people say, especially people in authority or church positions. so i don't think they should ban gay priests because they are not the problem with the priesthood. or at least not the big problem.

2007-03-10 02:25:31 · answer #9 · answered by SuzyBelle04 6 · 4 2

for some reason you can be a petaphile without being gay(it doesn't make much sense but it's true) so technically most of the priests were straight, just petaphiles. So really they should be banning petaphiles from being priests which seems logical. There is nothing wrong with a gay guy becomin a priest

2007-03-10 02:24:12 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers