Both one and two were great movies, 3 sucked the life out of the first two. I was seriously disappointed. If they couldn't have come up with a better idea than that they should have ended it with two!
2007-03-09 23:11:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by Celeste P 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
3
2007-03-10 03:33:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
1 will always be the best. It was the whole shock value of it and was a new turn on horror/suspense movies, that's why people liked it. The second and third ones while they are still ok movies, you know a little about what to expect, which takes away from the movie.
2007-03-09 23:56:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by venomiss2000 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah. I've also only seen 1 & 2. Out of those I think 2 was better.
2007-03-09 23:25:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by ♠Tatsuko♠ 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
The ending for the first movie, (where Tobin Bell stands up in the middle of the room) makes it the best of the three. I would even wager that it will be better than the 4th SAW movie once it finally gets released.
2007-03-09 23:17:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by lustatfirstbite 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
1 was the best for me
2007-03-09 23:50:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by dagatedy_2000 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I saw all 3 but I like the first one better. More gorry and more mystery to Jigsaw's character. The third one had drama which didnt interest me.
2007-03-09 23:48:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by hellgirl 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
saw 1 definatly had more of a plot and more suspense than the other 2
2007-03-09 23:14:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by yvonne p 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
Saw 1-it creeped me out,especially when Cary Elwes saws off his foot! Eww!
2007-03-09 23:10:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by cats 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
The first one because Cary Elwes is in it. There doesn't appear to be a point in the 2nd or 3rd.
2007-03-09 23:16:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by noonenowhere23 3
·
0⤊
0⤋