English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Isreal has warnd the cud do this, Iran said it won't be in isreal's best interest, cud this be the start of world war3?!!

2007-03-09 22:51:12 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

22 answers

Iran will get a litlle lost and then fight back by firing missiles at Isreal.
Massive air strike at Isreal will be the consequences. Iran will send their warplane to Isreal at whatever cost.

At the end, Isreal will pay back for their underestimate of Iran reaction. Iran will of course in total chaos.

2007-03-10 00:37:41 · answer #1 · answered by Ho K 3 · 0 0

i'm fully against it for too many motives to circulate into element. at the start there are 2 wars occurring in the midsection East, Iraq and Afghanistan. 2d, dazzling Iran could deliver deadly consequences for us all premier the finished international into international conflict 3. Thirdly, the u . s . a . is the only us of a in the history of nuclear weapons to certainly drop a nuclear bomb, Hiroshima ring any bells? Why this surprising want and prefer to apply pre-emptive strikes? would not international kinfolk artwork? i'm so unwell of lack of expertise and absence of compassion displayed via some human beings. that's stressful and frightening that a number of those absolutely everyone seems to be in a some distance better place of power than others.

2016-10-01 21:18:24 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

A definite result would be an Iranian attempt to blockade of the Gulf, so oil shipments would be blocked. Iran could possibly retaliate by firing missiles at Israel and at US ships in the Gulf.

"World War III" assumes that the hostilities would be global, with several countries taking sides. This I cannot see. Although there would be a global impact (interruption of oil supplies), the conflict would be regional.

2007-03-09 22:55:54 · answer #3 · answered by lesroys 6 · 0 0

Militarily speaking, No country is the middle east stands a chance against Israel. They have had nuclear weapons since the 1970's. I'm sure they've continually updated their aresenal throughout the years.
I think it's safe to assume they have plenty of tactical nukes nowadays, so they could pretty much wipe the floor with Iran if they wanted too.

2007-03-09 22:54:46 · answer #4 · answered by summit_of_human_intellect 3 · 1 0

The result would be no more Iranian nuclear facilities. I don't know about World War 3. The offensive capability of Israel's neighbours is very weak. There might be a bit of sabre-rattling but that's about all. I would imagine a new wave of terrorism would be the most likely response.

2007-03-09 22:59:11 · answer #5 · answered by massadaman 4 · 0 0

The result would be Iran would no longer be nuclear and as for a blockade,it ain't happening US missiles could take out the whole Iranian fleet in 2 days from 1000 miles away if they had to.

2007-03-09 22:58:34 · answer #6 · answered by JOHN D 6 · 0 0

Bring it on.
Israel should attack. They know for a fact that Iran will as soon as they are able.
I doubt it will start WW3... and even if it does I don't thing the USA has anything to worry about.
Anyone who has nukes capable of hitting us isn't our enemy.
Some people think China will get involved... even if they do they'll be on our side. They want the oil to flow just as much as the rest of the world.

2007-03-09 23:10:00 · answer #7 · answered by psych0bug 5 · 0 0

Definitely the start of WW3...Attacking Iran won't involve only Israel and Iran,there are going to be many more countries involved and it won't be just a regional conflict...So it won't be in no one best interest to attack Iran...

2007-03-10 02:42:38 · answer #8 · answered by Tinkerbell05 6 · 0 0

Within 20-100 years the surviving species of Earth would have begun to recover, most likely large colonies of bees or their significantly advanced progeny would rule the planet. A general state of global unrest would still exist as colonies vie for pollen producing vegetation....

Til then...a whole bunch of fire and bits of rubble bouncing about....

2007-03-09 22:57:30 · answer #9 · answered by Clif S 3 · 0 0

I think they are holding back as much as they can in lieu of someone threatening to wipe them off the face of the earth. That pres of Iran needs to stop his 'Mahdi' mission that prompts world-wide chaos & force into the Islamic doctrine.

2007-03-09 22:59:54 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers