English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

4 answers

Yes it does make sense. Even with the outsourcing , beginner in India earns about $8000 an year . However a similar graduate in the US earns abut $ 80000 an year. Even with all those on site opportunities an Indian sw professional gets $4000 at their on site base while a similar person who works full time in the US earns almost double that.

Moreover i can say that the quality of work is better in the US. Its true that there are plenty of jobs which are outsourced to India. But most of it is sustenance or maintenance. It is sad to see that most of the development work happens n the US and just the junk work is done here. And mind it , u don't need an engineering degree to do the kind of work done in India. This is the reason why most sw companies in India have started recruiting from the science streams like B.Sc and BCA.

Of course you will earn double what your parents have earned at the end of their careers. But the work here is monotonous and tiring. If you want challenging development go for the M.S. Its like saying that i became an engineer to build the car not to repair it.

2007-03-09 22:53:35 · answer #1 · answered by Code Name Johny 2 · 0 0

An MS in US is accepted as a good qualification by Indian employers who take up outsoursed jobs. One gets paid well in India after MS in US.
American MS is better than Indian equivalent of M.Tech or ME because countless Indian Engineering colleges diluted academic standards .

2007-03-10 07:05:39 · answer #2 · answered by J.SWAMY I ఇ జ స్వామి 7 · 0 0

go for the MS

2007-03-10 07:29:58 · answer #3 · answered by abd 5 · 0 0

U.S is technically and financially very advance in every field then india, so why not learn from the experts.

2007-03-10 07:05:04 · answer #4 · answered by jammy 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers