If you say they do, in some speciffic war, by selling lies and propaganda themselves, or later through the end product called fabricated news, and it's consequences are as deep and lasting as the everlasting hatred and distrust it causes between confronted people (aside the economic aspect), would that be a not ended war against the guilt of journalists? Should Christine Amanpour sleep deeply as she does now, and is it moral to let her get away and do more damage? Should the destroyed people and their lives, allow such monsters like her and her CNN to spread new destruction in the world? Should they be judged and dealt upon with the popular political-juditiary formula: "Knew about it or was in possition to know about and did nothing or did not enough..."? Where does their responsibility start and where does it end? Should international law follow the growing destructivity and importance of media warfare?
Please read another question: "In the footsteps of Crusaders and Zionists?"
2007-03-09 19:15:25 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
You are right - our media/propaganda system is out of control, or is it in the control of the wrong people. Check out http://911research.wtc7.net for quite complete information about 9/11 & propaganda. They follow the slippery trails of coverup, misinformation, etc. This shows that our media is controlled to generate a purpose. So many people were decieved in such an obvious manner by the official portrayal of 911, and our media helped to do that. There should be a law that only facts should be reported - no opinions, or separate facts and opinions/speculation of what those facts mean into separate shows. If you've ever done any video editing, you know that you can completely twist the meaning of what a person says, or what happened in what order through skillful editing. So there should be a law that editing must be kept in sequence and if stuff is cut out the people should have access to the full footage online or something like that. There is so much dishonesty in our govt and media I don't even bother to watch TV anymore. I don't think that there should be only 'fluffy feel-good stories' on the news, but there is way too much fear & loathing propaganda out there, and if not that, it is a distraction - like the drama of Anna Nicole Smith currently being used to detract our attention from the govt's push to go to war in Iran and N. Korea. The govt./Bush wants to get the rest of the war agenda from 1991 put in place before he retires: i.e. Pre-emptive strikes on Iraq (already did it), Iran, N. Korea, and Syria or Pakistan. Remember my words!
2007-03-09 19:51:34 · answer #1 · answered by Nadine - Unity CEO 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Your right! All journalists should just ignore the bombings and carnage and focus only on feel good stories like GIs handing out candy to kids, and fresh coats of paint on the local school house.
Maybe they can get Martha Stewart and Rachael Ray to do some cooking shows in Iraq?.........I'd watch that!
2007-03-09 19:35:47 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
That dying could be taken care of with suspicion. they have not something to concern for engaging in the "merchandising" of the conflict. That became the activity of the mainstream newshounds. in the event that they start brazenly admitting the collusion with the government to sell the conflict, then mortality comes into question.
2016-10-01 21:12:10 · answer #3 · answered by leisinger 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
pretty much, thank the liberals for how this war is portrayed. They make it seem like we have made no progress. And, that the war is all about oil. Sure, oil has something to do with it, but not like the lefties want you to think it does. They just want to make the republicans look bad so they can get power and mess things up 100 times worse
2007-03-09 19:21:09 · answer #4 · answered by F1isTHEbest 1 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Could you perhaps rephrase your question in some recognizable form of English?
2007-03-09 19:20:45 · answer #5 · answered by marianddoc 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋