Should a child that was obviously left behind be proposing "No Child Left Behind" laws?

Answer 1

Its incredible people try to defend the idiots intelligence. The idiot went to Yale because he is a legacy from a filthy rich and powerful family. Even an idiot can see the man is an idiot.

Answer 2

No

The No Child Left Behind is going to leave every child behind because the government is once again ignoring the obvious. Homeschooling has been massively outperforming public schools and outperforming private schools by a large, but lesser, margin. We need to end Socialized Education. Private Schools, homeschooling, and charities such as churches can provide education much better than the current system. School standards keep falling, but we keep pumping more money into the schools and expanding the length of school, causing standards to decrease even more. SAT scores fell 50 parts from 67-02 despite the SAT II being introduced in 95 which was 100 points easier. The largest drop was among the highest scoring. People even get shot in public schools (nobody mentions that the federal government law prohibiting guns on school zones prevents teachers from having guns to defend the class against the mass-murderers). The curriculum is boring. Whenever a class is successful, the school tries to interfere with that success (I can remember an elective that created enthusiasm among the class and which filled up really quick as most of the school wanted to take it, but was constantly facing complaints from the administration because the grading system was a little bit suspect and there was plenty of controversy coming out of that class).

Bush actually had strong grades while in score (his grades at Yale would have been As nowadays and were better than his classmate John Kerry), but he became a drunk afterward. He woke up on his 40th birthday hungover and stopped drinking but he's still drunk. He must have been a really heavy drunk to still be drunk 20 years later. Bush's drinking and drug abuse came up during the 2000 election but he was as unaffected by it as Bill Clinton was by his numerous adulteries. Maybe we should pay more attention to the little things next thing we're picking a president because we don't need another Bush or Clinton. 20 years of the Bush-Clinton Dynasty has us screwed up enough. We don't need 8 more.

Answer 3

Well considering he has a degree from an ivy league university... and hos wife is a teacher, I think he maybe has a little more room to decided what kind of education is made available. But remember the president only propose the laws, he does not enforce or enacts the laws.

by the way point gaming is not permitted, neither is having multiple accounts, Mr orange/Nancy/jasmine etc...

apparently some one could have benefited from that program, i just don't know which of your avatars to pick.

Answer 4

And *how* many Ivy League degrees do you hold?

Just think....Bush did even better at Yale than Kerry did. I think it's hilarious to see Kerry supporters talking about how dumb Bush is...they voted for someone even *dumber*!

Hmm - that explains a lot of the bitterness....I

Answer 5

Yeah, probable authentic after the regulation that he passes to legalize marijuana. Or a minimum of for those that his lover replaced into starting to be interior their residing house that he stated he knew no longer something approximately. Yeah, authentic! How those people are nonetheless in place of work is previous me. unquestionably disgusting.

Answer 6

Thats a good one. I'll have to remember that at the next Liberal Media Club cocktail party..

Answer 7

That was funny...oh wait, I meant obnoxious. Now did you have a serious question or are we just taking cheap shots tonight?

Answer 8

He he. Maybe he feels bad.