OH, please no more US government 9/11 conspiracy theories.
By now, we all know JFK and RFK were murdered by the Mob for reneging on their promises to the Mob when JFK was campaigning. So, there is your assassination conspiracy. It is also well known that Kennedy's father rigged the Chicago vote and other votes to get JFK into office. Nixon knew this and it marked his attitude for life. Nixon conceded the election and left Washington because he made a conscious decision not to split the Nation apart fighting over the election. He reckoned all the problems with racism and integration (at the time) coupled with a scandal about the Presidency might bring down the USA.
Development of the A bomb was kept secret by the US government; and they can keep things secret as we know from recent developments with the Iraq war.
2007-03-09 18:12:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Manhattan project did leak out - Google for Klaus Fuchs, Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, and the various stories that it leads you on to. These were people who thought secrecy about anything so important was not justifiable, but they were prosecuted for passing information.
The media would pay a fortune to anybody involved in a JFK assassination conspiracy who decided to "blow the whistle" on it, especially if this discredited some previously admired people. It hasn't happened, so I don't think it ever will, but that doesn't prove that the logic in the Numbers program is reliable.
Certain activities in Britain during World War 2 involved several thousands of people, and remained completely secret for over thirty years. Specifically, Bletchley Park from 1943 until Walter Winterbotham was allowed to publish "The Ultra Secret" in 1974, but others have come to light even more recently. It sounds as though Charlie Epps would claim this was impossible too, but it actually happened.
2007-03-10 02:35:05
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Lee Harvey Oswald shot JFK from the sith floor of the Dallas Textbook Depository as JFK became using at approximately 3 miles an hour on Dealy Plaza. Oswald fired 3 photos, 2 of which hit JFK. Of the two that hit, the 1st went by using JFK's neck and went directly to strike Governor John Connolly by using the area, wrist and leg. The weapon fired became a 6.5 Manlicher/ Carcano Italian conflict surplus bolt action rifle. Oswald became a knowledgeable Marine Corp professional rifle marksman. The 0.33 shot struck JFK on the decrease back suitable area of his head, and this brought about super concepts and cranium fragment loss which flew forward. the top.
2016-10-01 21:10:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by leisinger 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
They sometimes overdo it on that show. Charlie often uses probability to "prove" that some things are impossible. Probabilities are, of course, no way to prove impossibility. They can only estimate the likelyhood of events. Numbers is not a good source of legitimate information.
2007-03-09 22:22:48
·
answer #4
·
answered by Biznachos 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
one wild theory was dealt with on george noory on am america about a year ago,,,,,jfk was done in by soviet kgb because of humiliation in berlin 61 crisis, bay of pigs, cuban missle crisis.sovs kod secret service with girls,booze & pills the night before the k crew arrived in dallas.lbj was briefed as to sov involvement,talks with cj warren,speaker rayburn.situation amounted to a potential war between us & russia over the death of 1 man,vs millions;public disclosure of this might have meant a military coup.better to form a commission,arrive at a finding with the least cost to the us.successive presidents are briefed on this,culminating in ronald reagans throwing the collosus to the mat in 1989-1990 what would jfk think of all this?"I felt something hit my head,,,,all of a sudden I'm looking down on me,,,except my back is fine,,,,,,,jacquelines looking for something on the trunk of the lincoln.........ahfter a bit ,I see pahtrick,kick,joe juniah,,,,,,,,,wyell,,,,ths isn't awl that bahd,,,,the fellas from 109.......
2007-03-09 18:50:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by quackpotwatcher 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
What do you think about these? Coincidences or..
Abraham Lincoln was elected to Congress in 1846.
John F. Kennedy was elected to Congess in 1946.
Abrahan Lincoln was elected President in 1860.
John F. Kennedy wass elected President in 1960.
The names Lincoln and Kennedy each contain seven letters.
Both were particularly concerned with civil rights.
Both wives lost their children while living in the White House.
Both Presidents were shot on a Friday. Both were shot in the head.
Lincoln's secretary was named Kennedy.
Kennedy's secretary was named Lincoln.
Both were assassinated by Southerners.
Both succeeded by Southerners.
Both successors were named Johnson.
Andrew Johnson, who succeeded Lincoln, was born in 1808.
Lyndon Johnson, who succeeded Kennedy was born in 1908.
John Wilkes Booth, who assassinated Lincoln was born in 1839.
Lee Harvey Oswald, who assassinated Kennedy was born in 1939.
Both assassins were known by their three names.
Both names comprise fifteen letters.
Booth ran from the theater and was caught in a warehouse.
Oswald ran from a warehouse and was caught in a theatre.
To cap it all off, Booth and Oswald were assassinated before their trials.
Little known fact:
One week before Lincoln's death, he was in Monroe, Maryland.
One week before Kennedy's death, he was in Marilyn Monroe. =))
* Both men were involved in civil rights.
* Both were assassinated in the presence of their wives.
* Both their successors were called Johnson, were southern democrats and in the senate
* Andrew Johnson was born 1808 and Lyndon Johnson in 1908.
* Booth and Oswald were both southerners favoring unpopular ideas
* Lincoln's secretary, whose first name was John, advised him not to go to the theatre. Kennedy's secretary, whose first name was Lincoln, advises against the trip to Dallas.
* Both assassins were killed before coming to trial.
* And probably the weirdest of all. Booth shot Lincoln in a theatre and ran to a warehouse. Oswald shot Kennedy from a warehouse and ran to a theatre.
believe it or not
2007-03-09 18:08:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋